首页> 外文学位 >Analysis of the National Study of Postsecondary Faculty: Does a gender gap persist among science faculty?
【24h】

Analysis of the National Study of Postsecondary Faculty: Does a gender gap persist among science faculty?

机译:国家高等教育学院研究的分析:科学学院之间是否存在性别差距?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine the veracity of the ongoing claim that a gender gap persists among postsecondary science faculty despite more than three decades of federal, state and private sector programs as well as affirmative action legislation, designed to identify and educate women and minorities in mathematics and science. This study concentrated specifically on the experience of women in the physical sciences focusing on tenure track hiring, salary parity, publication rates, instruction and research opportunities, etc.—general job satisfaction—relative to those of male science faculty.; This research sought to determine whether these variables were significant contributors to the alleged gender gap, and determine their quantitative significance. The variables selected were the result of an extensive literature review focusing on cultural and economic factors; gate-keeping and glass ceiling experiences; and pre- and post-employment experiences as postsecondary science faculty.; Data regarding these variables was obtained from the restricted edition of the National Study of Postsecondary Faculty (NSOPF), 1993 conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics within the Office of Educational Research and Improvement of the U.S. Department of Education. NSOPF surveyed more than 11,000 faculty at U.S. institutions of higher learning, using a stratified sample, and had a response rate of more than 80%.; The statistical methodology discussed in this analysis included the use of Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and maximum likelihood in the form of Linear Structural Relations (LISREL) modeling. LISREL is more powerful than path analysis and goes beyond the more typical exploratory factor analysis and allows the researcher to do confirmatory factor analysis.; The resulting analysis indicated that despite most efforts and the optimistic tones of government reports of the 1990s, a gender gap exists between men and women in postsecondary sciences. Women have yet to reach a critical mass as faculty in most departments, earn less than their male counterparts, have less access to research resources and publish with slightly less frequency. Surprisingly though, despite these conditions and after overcoming gate keeping and glass ceiling practices—women report about the same level of satisfaction with their jobs as men do.
机译:这项研究的目的是检验以下说法的真实性:尽管联邦,州和私营部门计划开展了三十多年,旨在识别和教育妇女及数学和科学少数派。这项研究的重点是女性在物理科学领域的经验,侧重于终身制录用,薪资均等,出版率,指导和研究机会等,即相对于男性科学系的总体工作满意度。这项研究试图确定这些变量是否是所谓的性别差距的重要因素,并确定其定量意义。选择的变量是针对文化和经济因素的大量文献综述的结果;守门和玻璃天花板的经验;以及大专科学系的就业前后经验;有关这些变量的数据是从1993年由美国教育部教育研究与改善办公室的国家教育统计中心进行的国家高等专科学院研究(NSOPF)的受限版中获得的。 NSOPF使用分层样本对美国高等院校的11,000多名教师进行了调查,答复率为80%以上。在此分析中讨论的统计方法包括使用普通最小二乘法(OLS)和线性结构关系(LISREL)建模形式的最大似然。 LISREL比路径分析更强大,并且超越了更典型的探索性因素分析,并允许研究人员进行确认性因素分析。结果分析表明,尽管做出了最大的努力,并且在1990年代政府报告中表现出乐观的语调,但在专上科学领域,男女之间仍然存在性别差距。在大多数系中,妇女的教职人员数量尚未达到临界水平,其收入低于男性,而获得研究资源的机会较少,出版频率也略低。令人惊讶的是,尽管有这些条件,并且在克服了关门和玻璃天花板的做法之后,妇女对工作的满意度却与男人相同。

著录项

  • 作者

    McCord, Robin Allyn.;

  • 作者单位

    Arizona State University.;

  • 授予单位 Arizona State University.;
  • 学科 Education Higher.; Womens Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 141 p.
  • 总页数 141
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 高等教育;社会学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号