首页> 外文学位 >Karn&dotbelow;a within the net of the 'Mahabharata': Reading the itihasa as literature.
【24h】

Karn&dotbelow;a within the net of the 'Mahabharata': Reading the itihasa as literature.

机译:卡恩在“摩low婆罗多”的网中:以文学形式阅读圣像。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Historically, Western scholarship has used an analytical, text-critical methodology to study the Mahabharata, treating the great Sanskrit itihasa as an unwieldy mass of religious, philosophical and mythological accretions covering an ancient epic core. Indic tradition, however, has always considered the Mahabharata a unified literary work. The renowned aestheticians of the 9 th and 10th centuries, Anandavardhana and Abhinavagupta, cited the Mahabharata as a supreme example of poetic unity. Reader-response criticism provides a vocabulary in harmony with contemporary scholarship whereby the tradition from which the Mahabharata has arisen may be respected and the insights of that tradition preserved. According to reader-response criticism, the role of the reader is embedded in a text; questions as to what a work means cannot be separated from questions as to what it does and how it does it---concerns shared by the rasa theory of the Indian aestheticians. A focus on the audience and author of a narrative impacts on our understanding of history. In the Indian case, that audience and author are accessible almost exclusively as the "Implied audience" and "Implied author" articulated by reader-response theory. The history of India is its literary history. Karn&dotbelow;a is the Mahabharata's pivotal character and distinctively embodies the itihasa's concerns; the implied author signals this repeatedly through a sophisticated use of narrative strategies. Karn&dotbelow;a stands for the human experience and uniquely represents the audience who receives the Mahabharata and is constructed by it. Through Karn&dotbelow;a the Mahabharata explores its overarching themes of fate, time, and death, of salvation, of class and lineage. Through this fascinating character we may begin to appreciate how the Mahabharata constructs its vast "net."
机译:从历史上看,西方学者一直使用一种分析性的,文本批判性的方法来研究《摩ab婆罗多》(Mahabharata),将梵文大正教徒看作是覆盖了古代史诗核心的大量宗教,哲学和神话般的咒语。然而,印度传统一直认为《摩Mah婆罗多》是一部统一的文学作品。 9世纪和10世纪著名的美学家Anandavardhana和Abhinavagupta认为《摩ab婆罗多》是诗意统一的最高典范。读者回应的批评提供了与现代学术和谐的词汇,从而可以尊重摩Mah婆罗多的起源传统,并保留该传统的见解。根据读者回应的批评,读者的角色是嵌入文本中的。关于一件作品意味着什么的问题不能与关于它的作用以及它的作用方式的问题分开———印度美学家的拉萨理论共有这些问题。对观众和叙述者的关注会影响我们对历史的理解。在印度的情况下,读者和作者几乎可以作为读者反应理论明确表达的“暗示的受众”和“暗示的作者”来访问。印度的历史就是它的文学史。卡恩&是摩ab婆罗多的关键人物,鲜明地体现了圣殿骑士的关切。暗示的作者通过复杂的叙事策略反复地暗示了这一点。卡恩·道夫(Karn)代表人类的经历,并独特地代表了接受摩ab婆罗多并由其建造的观众。 《摩ab婆罗多》通过卡恩dot下探讨了命运,时间和死亡,救赎,阶级和血统的总体主题。通过这个令人着迷的角色,我们可能会开始欣赏摩ab婆罗多如何构建其庞大的“网络”。

著录项

  • 作者

    Greer, Patricia Meredith.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Virginia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Virginia.;
  • 学科 Literature Asian.; Religion History of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 328 p.
  • 总页数 328
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教史、宗教地理 ;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号