首页> 外文学位 >Painting as a 'modern art': The era of Giotto
【24h】

Painting as a 'modern art': The era of Giotto

机译:绘画为“现代艺术”:乔托时代

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation studies the "modern art" (arte moderna) of painting as it was practiced and conceived in fourteenth- and early fifteenth-century Italy. The three chapters analyze texts ranging in date from the 1390s to the 1440s that describe painting as "modern." In each case, Giotto stands at the center of the discussion. Together, these sources demonstrate that the Middle Ages had its own distinctive criteria for the "modernity" of an "art," and that these criteria not only persisted, but even guided painting into the period known as the Renaissance.;The first chapter studies Cennino Cennini's famous assertion, written around 1400, that Giotto "changed the art of painting from Greek into Latin and made it modern." In order to understand this statement, which has long intrigued scholars, I propose that it is necessary to better understand the genre in which Cennini was writing. I argue that the form, structure, and conceptual parameters of Cennini's handbook (the Libro dell'arte) are the same as those of a wide variety of contemporary treatises on the "arts"---that is, artes, in the wide, medieval sense of the term that encompassed activities as diverse as arithmetic, poetry, carpentry, music, and preaching. Within this genre of late medieval technical literature, to make an art "modern" meant setting it on a new foundation in "science" (scientia) and rationalizing its procedures accordingly. When we compare the techniques described in Cennini's handbook with those of a Byzantine Greek treatise known in Italy during the same years, we see that the difference between the "Greek" and "modern" art of painting satisfied these same criteria. Giotto, in Cennini's eyes, had rationalized painting as a mode of production, imitating nature more closely not only in its outward appearance, but also inwardly, in its manner of operation.;The second chapter studies a novella written by the Florentine poet and novelist Franco Sacchetti in the 1390s. In it, a debate arises among the leading Florentine artists of the mid-fourteenth century as to who the greatest painter had been aside from Giotto. Alberto Arnoldi, a prominent sculptor of the time, "resolves" the debate by arguing that a group of "modern painters" had in fact superseded Giotto: the women of Florence, experts in their use of makeup. In support of this ironic claim, Alberto embarks on a long, detailed description of the feats of modern makeup: the improvement of complexion, the straightening of the nose, etc. As I show, each and every one of these cosmetic transformations actually corresponds to a characteristic visual difference between Greek and "modern" paintings. Praising makeup as if it were painting, Alberto mocks the putatively "vulgar" outlook that understood painting's modernization as a process of mere beautification, neglecting the criteria proper to the "art" as such. Sacchetti thus writes in defense of a more sophisticated conception of "modern art" akin to Cennini's, but in doing so reveals that this concept belonged to a circumscribed group of elite painters and intellectuals who consciously defined their views against those of the general populace.;The final chapter considers the fate of this fourteenth-century concept of "modern art" in the Renaissance by studying the work of the Paduan physician Michele Savonarola. Writing in the 1440s, Savonarola praised Giotto as the painter who "first modernized (modernizavit) ancient and mosaic figures," but also criticized him and his followers for their failure to fully rationalize the art's underlying idea (idea): the ideal human form. As a corrective, Savonarola develops a physiologically and statistically accurate canon of proportion to serve as a new scientific foundation for the art. In his mind, however, this ongoing process of modernization cannot help but steer the art back to the same state of perfection that Polykleitos had established in antiquity. Cennini's paradigm persists, but in practice, modernization is now indistinguishable from the imitation of the ancients.
机译:本文研究了在十四世纪和十五世纪初意大利实践和构思的绘画“现代艺术”(arte moderna)。这三章分析了从1390年代到1440年代的各种文字,这些文字将绘画描述为“现代”。在每种情况下,乔托都处于讨论的中心。这些资料一起表明,中世纪对于“艺术”的“现代性”有其独特的标准,并且这些标准不仅持续存在,甚至将绘画带入了文艺复兴时期。塞尼诺·塞尼尼(Cennino Cennini)著名的断言写于1400年左右,他说乔托“将绘画艺术从希腊语变为拉丁语,并使之变得现代”。为了理解这一引起学者长期关注的陈述,我认为有必要更好地理解Cennini写作的体裁。我认为,Cennini的手册(Libro dell'arte)的形式,结构和概念参数与有关“艺术”的各种当代论着的书相同-也就是说,中世纪的术语含义,涵盖各种活动,例如算术,诗歌,木工,音乐和讲道。在中世纪后期技术文学的这一流派中,使艺术成为“现代”意味着将其置于“科学”(“科学”)的新基础上,并相应地使其程序合理化。当我们将森尼尼手册中描述的技术与同年在意大利已知的拜占庭希腊专着的技术进行比较时,我们发现“希腊”和“现代”绘画艺术之间的差异满足了这些相同的标准。在塞恩尼尼看来,乔托将绘画合理化为一种生产方式,不仅在外观上,而且在操作方式上更内在地模仿自然。第二章研究了佛罗伦萨诗人和小说家的中篇小说。 1390年代的Franco Sacchetti。其中,十四世纪中叶的佛罗伦萨主要艺术家之间就谁是乔托之外最伟大的画家展开了辩论。当时的杰出雕塑家阿尔贝托·阿诺迪(Alberto Arnoldi)通过争辩说一群“现代画家”实际上已经取代了乔托:“佛罗伦萨的女性,她们是运用化妆的专家”,从而“解决”了这场辩论。为了支持这一具有讽刺意味的主张,阿尔贝托(Alberto)对现代化妆的功绩进行了详尽的详细描述:肤色的改善,鼻子的拉直等。正如我所展示的,这些化妆品的每一个转变实际上都与希腊和“现代”绘画之间的鲜明视觉差异。阿尔贝托称赞化妆品就像绘画一样,嘲笑一种假定的“庸俗”的观点,这种观点将绘画的现代化理解为仅仅是美化的过程,而忽略了适用于“艺术”的标准。因此,萨切蒂为捍卫一种类似于塞尼尼的“现代艺术”概念而辩护,但这样做却揭示了这一概念属于一群受限制的精英画家和知识分子,他们有意识地将自己的观点与普通民众的观点进行界定。最后一章通过研究巴杜安医师米歇尔·萨沃纳罗拉(Michele Savonarola)的作品,思考了文艺复兴时期14世纪“现代艺术”概念的命运。萨沃纳罗拉(Savonarola)在1440年代的写作中称赞乔托是“最早对古代和马赛克人物进行了现代化(现代化)”的画家,但也批评他和他的追随者未能充分合理化艺术的基本思想(理想):理想的人形。作为一种矫正剂,Savonarola开发出生理和统计学上准确的比例标准,以作为该领域的新科学基础。然而,在他看来,这种持续不断的现代化进程无非将艺术带回到了波利克莱托斯在古代确立的完美状态。塞尼尼的范式一直存在,但实际上,现代化与古代人的模仿是无法区分的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Brennan, Robert.;

  • 作者单位

    New York University.;

  • 授予单位 New York University.;
  • 学科 Art history.;European history.;Medieval history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 510 p.
  • 总页数 510
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号