首页> 外文学位 >Democratic morality and the Freedom Academy debate: Thought control, propaganda, and the United States government, 1954--1968.
【24h】

Democratic morality and the Freedom Academy debate: Thought control, propaganda, and the United States government, 1954--1968.

机译:民主道德与自由学院辩论:思想控制,宣传和美国政府,1954--1968年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

During the 1950s and 1960s, over a period spanning three presidential administrations, American officials in and out of Congress debated establishing the “Freedom Academy”—a proposed institution where both private American citizens and government officials would receive training in political warfare and propaganda tactics to help fight the cold war. As conceived, the academy was to become a “West Point” for “fourth-dimensional war” studies. This dissertation describes and analyzes how and why enthusiasts of Freedom Academy legislation sought to institutionalize their propaganda program, and how and why their critics labored to prevent it. Debate about the academy in and out of government is traced from its origins to its conclusion, with the primary focus being on the creation of counterarguments and counter-legislation by John Kennedy's administration.; The dissertation proposes that debate about the Freedom Academy should be located within the broader context of ongoing propaganda dialectic in America. Illustrating how the dialectic has expanded and retracted over time since 1906, the dissertation demonstrates that the dialectic was expanding during the cold war at the time of the Freedom Academy debate. The roots of the dialectic, the dissertation theorizes, are explained by intellectual history, which argues that a residue of traditional republican values in the American psyche—long subordinated by the ascendancy of liberalism—has created enduring tensions in American political culture. This, in turn, accounts for competing definitions of democracy among Americans. The twentieth century's propaganda dialectic, the dissertation concludes, was therefore an extension of these older, competing philosophies and political doctrines. By virtue of this fact, it was also a manifestation of America's enduring struggle to define its national identity and the nature of its own democratic experiment.
机译:在1950年代和1960年代的三个总统任期内,美国官员在国会内外辩论建立“自由学院”,这是一个提议的机构,美国私人公民和政府官员都将接受有关政治战争和宣传策略的培训。帮助打冷战。按照设想,该学院将成为“第四次世界大战”研究的“西点”。本文描述并分析了自由学院立法的发烧友如何以及为什么将其宣传计划制度化,以及其批评者如何以及为何努力阻止这种宣传。关于政府进出学术界的争论是从其起源到其结论的,其主要焦点是约翰·肯尼迪政府创建反议论和反立法。论文提出,关于自由学院的辩论应在美国正在进行的宣传辩证法的更广泛背景下进行。论文说明了自1906年以来辩证法是如何随着时间的推移而扩展和收缩的,论文证明了在自由学院辩论之时的冷战时期,辩证法在不断扩展。论文的理论从理论上解释了辩证法的根源,该历史认为,美国心理中传统的共和主义价值观的残余(长期受到自由主义的支配)已经在美国政治文化中造成了持久的张力。反过来,这也解释了美国人之间相互竞争的民主定义。因此,论文得出结论,二十世纪的宣传辩证法是这些古老的,相互竞争的哲学和政治学说的延伸。由于这一事实,这也是美国为确定自己的国家身份和自己的民主试验的性质而进行的持久努力的体现。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cone, Stacey.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 History United States.; Journalism.; Mass Communications.; American Studies.; Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 348 p.
  • 总页数 348
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 美洲史;新闻学、新闻事业;传播理论;政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号