首页> 外文学位 >Three Inclusive Settings: The Comparative Effects on the Academic Achievement of Students With and Without Disabilities
【24h】

Three Inclusive Settings: The Comparative Effects on the Academic Achievement of Students With and Without Disabilities

机译:三种包容性环境:对残疾人和非残疾人学生学习成绩的比较影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to determine if three inclusive educational settings (general, SAM and TAM) result in significant differences in the academic achievement of students with disabilities (SWD) and without disabilities as measured by the Delaware Comprehensive Assessment System (DCAS) for reading and math. A causal comparative research design was used to observe the effects of student placement in different inclusionary settings. In the general education setting, students did not receive instruction from a special education teacher. In the single approach to mastery (SAM) setting, students received instruction from a solo-teacher certified in special education and a core content area. In the team approach to mastery (TAM) setting, students received instruction from a core content teacher and a certified special education teacher. The average growth by grade level was calculated for fall and spring across all three settings. The achievement gap between SWD and nondisabled students was compared to identify the effectiveness of the districts' inclusion programs for compliance with the No Child Left Behind Act (2001). Data from the sample used in this study were collected from seven elementary schools and three middle schools located in one school district in northern Delaware. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to assess differences in reading and mathematics achievement related to educational settings. A two-way factorial analysis of variance was used to assess DCAS reading and mathematics achievement differences of students with and without disabilities and the interactions between educational settings (general, SAM and TAM) and type of students (SWD and nondisabled). Educational setting did not make a difference in student achievement for either students with or without disabilities. Findings from this study were used to develop an improvement plan for addressing the learning needs of SWD in the Northern Delaware School district.
机译:本研究的目的是确定特拉华州综合评估系统(DCAS)测算的三种包容性教育环境(普通,SAM和TAM)是否导致残疾学生(SWD)和非残疾学生的学业成绩有显着差异。阅读和数学。因果的比较研究设计用于观察学生在不同包容性环境中的安置效果。在普通教育环境中,学生没有接受特殊教育老师的指导。在单一的掌握方式(SAM)设置中,学生接受了特殊教育和核心内容领域认证的单身教师的指导。在团队掌握技巧(TAM)设置中,学生接受了核心内容老师和认证的特殊教育老师的指导。计算了这三种设置下秋季和春季的年级平均增长率。比较了社署和非残障学生之间的成就差距,以确认各地区的融入计划对遵守《不让任何孩子落后法案》(2001年)的有效性。本研究中使用的样本数据来自特拉华州北部一个学区的7所小学和3所中学。描述性和推论性统计用于评估与教育环境相关的阅读和数学成绩的差异。使用方差的双向因子分析来评估DCAS阅读和数学成绩差异(有和没有残疾的学生)以及教育环境(普通,SAM和TAM)与学生类型(SWD和非残疾)之间的相互作用。无论有无残疾的学生,教育背景都不会影响学生的学习成绩。这项研究的结果被用于制定改进计划,以解决北特拉华学校地区社署的学习需求。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ickes, Jeffrey D.;

  • 作者单位

    Wilmington University (Delaware).;

  • 授予单位 Wilmington University (Delaware).;
  • 学科 Educational leadership.;Secondary education.;Special education.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 94 p.
  • 总页数 94
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号