首页> 外文学位 >Cultural confessionalism: Literary resistance and the Bekennende Kirche.
【24h】

Cultural confessionalism: Literary resistance and the Bekennende Kirche.

机译:文化自白主义:文学反抗和贝肯嫩德·基什。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines a cultural resistance paradigm in the writings of three prominent Protestant figures in Germany during the Nazi regime: Martin Niemöller, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, and Ernst Wiechert. Against the background of the culture Protestant movement and within the confessionalist trend of the Kirchenkampf, each of these writers recuperates a part of the German literary heritage by means of “cultural confessionalism” as a way of ideologically confronting the literary and cultural aesthetics proclaimed by the National Socialists. By harking back to important German cultural figures, and in some cases by mobilizing nineteenth-century literary strategies in a way that was different from the literary “inner emigration,” Niemöller, Wiechert, and Bonhoeffer “confess” a German literary heritage that resisted the Nazi appropriation of that heritage.;Chapter one explains the origins of “cultural confessionalism” and defines the term against the historical and theological backdrop of the culture Protestant movement and its influence on Karl Barth and the members of the Pastors' Emergency League, including Bonhoeffer and Niemöller. Chapter two shows how the “cultural confesionalists” used the nineteenth-century German literary heritage in ways that varied from the strategies of the “inner emigration,” the political resistance, and the Christian humanist tradition. Chapter three explores the last twenty-eight sermons preached by Martin Niemöller before his arrest in 1937, and demonstrates how Niemöller revitalizes Lutherdeutsch as an oppositional tool. Chapter four shows the link between Martin Niemöller and Ernst Wiechert, and examines Wiechert's novel Der Totenwald (1939) as the apex of Wiechert's turn toward the “cultural confessionalist” style.;Chapter five in turn analyzes an earlier novel by Wiechert, Die Majorin (1934), which serves as an early example of Wiechert's resistance writing with its distinctive reworking of a Stifter novella, Der Hochwald (1842). Chapter six looks at Dietrich Bonhoeffer's unfinished novel written in Tegel in 1943 and shows how his literary attempts are an effort to invoke Bildungsbürgertum through “cultural confessionalism.” The final chapter explicates three of Bonhoeffer's poems, also composed during the Tegel incarceration, and explains how Bonhoeffer recuperates poetry from Goethe, Hölderlin, and Rilke as resistance literature. Overall the study explores a new mode of literary resistance that sought its ideological underpinnings from German canonical writers and Deutsches Bürgertum.
机译:这项研究考察了纳粹政权时期德国三位杰出的新教教徒人物著作中的文化抵抗范式:马丁·尼姆勒勒,迪特里希·鲍霍弗和恩斯特·维希特。在文化新教运动的背景下,并在基尔肯坎普的自白主义趋势下,这些作家中的每位作者都通过“文化自白主义”来弥补德国文学遗产的一部分,以此作为意识形态上对付德国所宣称的文学和文化美学的一种方式。国家社会主义者。尼默勒尔,维希特和博诺弗通过回到德国重要的文化人物手中,并在某些情况下以不同于文学“内部移民”的方式动员了十九世纪的文学策略,“承认”德国抵抗了纳粹对该遗产的挪用。第一章解释了“文化cultural悔主义”的起源,并在文化新教运动及其对卡尔·巴特和牧师紧急联盟成员(包括邦霍弗)的影响下,界定了该术语的历史和神学背景。和Niemöller。第二章说明“文化自白主义者”如何利用19世纪德国的文学遗产,其方式不同于“内部移民”,政治抵抗和基督教人本主义传统的策略。第三章探讨了马丁·尼默勒在1937年被捕之前宣讲的最后28条讲道,并展示了尼默勒如何振兴路德申作为反对派工具。第四章显示了马丁·尼尔默勒(MartinNiemöller)和恩斯特·维希特(Ernst Wiechert)之间的联系,并审视了维希特的小说《托特瓦尔德(Der Totenwald)(1939)》,这是维希特转向“文化自白主义者”风格的顶点。 (1934),这是Wiechert的反抗写作的早期例子,其独特的Stifter中篇小说Der Hochwald(1842)进行了翻修。第六章介绍了迪特里希·邦霍弗(Dietrich Bonhoeffer)1943年在特格尔(Tegel)上写的未完成的小说,并展示了他的文学尝试是如何通过“文化自白主义”来唤起《圣经》的。最后一章阐释了Bonhoeffer的三首诗,它们也是在泰格尔(Tegel)监禁期间撰写的,并解释了Bonhoeffer如何使歌德,荷尔德林和里尔克的诗歌调和为抵抗文学。总体而言,该研究探索了一种新的文学反抗模式,该模式寻求德国规范作家和德意志联邦法院的意识形态基础。

著录项

  • 作者

    Henley, Grant Holder.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Literature Germanic.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 291 p.
  • 总页数 291
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号