首页> 外文学位 >The origins and implementation of the 1992 Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) Agreement.
【24h】

The origins and implementation of the 1992 Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) Agreement.

机译:1992年《核供应商集团》(NSG)协议的起源和执行。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The 1992 Nuclear Suppliers (NSG) Agreement remains the only multilateral forum, with the exception of the complementary Zangger Committee, in which states capable of supplying nuclear and nuclear-related technologies attempt to constrain the flow of these technologies to countries of proliferation concern. This study reviews the history of multilateral nuclear nonproliferation export control cooperation and complementary international safeguards systems leading up to the conclusion of the 1992 NSG Agreement.; This review reveals that nuclear-related crises like the Indian nuclear explosion of the 1974 and the discovery of the Iraqi near-proliferation in 1991 have been the most proximate causes of multilateral reforms, but that U.S. domestic politics has been the primary filter through which these crises have been interpreted and subsequently translated into domestic and multilateral export control arrangements. This study therefore asks the question as to whether or not the "feedback loop" between proliferation-related crises and multilateral export control reform remains in place.; To evaluate the main variables responsible for reform and the evolving relationships between them, three increasingly stringent stages of multilateral export controls on nuclear weapons-related technology from 1943 to 1992 are analyzed. These variables are then reviewed for the 1992--2002 period and compared to the three earlier stages of reform to assess the continued relevance of the determinative factors of Cold War-era export control reforms to the export control challenges of the 21st century. This study concludes that the crisis-reform dynamic is unlikely to repeat itself due to changes at the U.S. domestic level, but that knowledgeable bureaucrats and outside experts remain prepared to pursue reform should U.S. leaders attempt to pursue reform in the absence of the public pressures created by a nuclear-related crisis.
机译:1992年《核供应商协议》仍然是唯一的多边论坛,但补充的桑格委员会除外,在桑格委员会中,有能力提供核及与核相关技术的国家试图限制这些技术向扩散方面国家的流动。这项研究回顾了多边核不扩散出口管制合作和补充国际保障体系的历史,这些历史导致了1992年《国家安全与核武器协定》的缔结。这篇评论揭示了与核相关的危机,例如1974年的印度核爆炸和1991年伊拉克的近扩散的发现,是造成多边改革的最直接原因,但美国国内政治一直是这些危机的主要过滤器危机已经得到解释,随后转化为国内和多边出口管制安排。因此,这项研究提出了一个问题,即与扩散有关的危机与多边出口管制改革之间的“反馈回路”是否仍然存在。为了评估负责改革的主要变量以及它们之间不断发展的关系,分析了1943年至1992年对核武器相关技术进行多边出口管制的三个日益严格的阶段。然后回顾了1992--2002年的这些变量,并将其与改革的三个早期阶段进行了比较,以评估冷战时期出口管制改革的决定性因素与21世纪出口管制挑战的持续相关性。这项研究得出的结论是,由于美国国内层面的变化,危机改革的动力不太可能重演,但是,如果美国领导人在没有施加公共压力的情况下尝试进行改革,那么知识渊博的官僚和外部专家仍准备进行改革。一场核危机。

著录项

  • 作者

    Perry, Todd Eran.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Maryland, College Park.;

  • 授予单位 University of Maryland, College Park.;
  • 学科 History Modern.; Political Science General.; Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 382 p.
  • 总页数 382
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 现代史(1917年~);政治理论;国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号