首页> 外文学位 >Discourse semantics of S-modifying adverbials.
【24h】

Discourse semantics of S-modifying adverbials.

机译:S修饰状语的话语语义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this thesis, we address the question of why certain S-modifying adverbials are only interpretable with respect to the discourse or spatio-temporal context, and not just their own matrix clause. It is not possible to list these adverbials because the set of adverbials is compositional and therefore infinite. Instead, we investigate the mechanisms underlying their interpretation. We present a corpus-based analysis of the predicate argument structure and interpretation of over 13,000 S-modifying adverbials. We use prior research on discourse deixis and clause-level predicates to study the semantics of the arguments of S-modifying adverbials and the syntactic constituents from which they can be derived. We show that many S-modifying adverbials contain semantic arguments that may not be syntactically overt, but whose interpretation nevertheless context. Prior work has investigated only a small subset of these discourse connectives; at the clause-level their semantics has been largely ignored and at the discourse level they are usually treated as “signals” light on the space of relations imparted by a much wider variety of adverbials. We further show how their predicate argument structure and interpretation can be formalized and incorporated into a rich intermediate model of discourse that alone among other models views discourse connectives as predicates whose syntax and semantics must be specified and recoverable to interpret discourse. It is not only due to their argument structure and interpretation that adverbials have been treated as discourse connectives, however. Our corpus contains adverbials whose semantics alone does not cause them to be interpreted with respect to We explore other explanations for why these adverbials evoke discourse context for their interpretation; in particular, we show how the interaction of prosody with the interpretation of S-modifying adverbials can contribute to discourse coherence, and we also show how S-modifying adverbials can be used to convey implicatures.
机译:在本文中,我们解决了一个问题,即为什么某些修饰S的副词只能相对于话语或时空上下文进行解释,而不仅仅是它们自己的矩阵从句。不可能列出这些副词,因为副词集是组成性的,因此是无限的。相反,我们调查了其解释的基础机制。我们对谓词参数结构进行了基于语料库的分析,并对超过13,000个S-修饰状语进行了解释。我们使用对话语代词和从句级谓语的先前研究来研究修饰S的副词的论点的语义以及可从其获得的句法成分。我们表明,许多修饰S的副词都包含语义论点,这些论点可能在语法上并不明显,但是其解释仍然是上下文。先前的工作仅调查了这些话语连接词的一小部分;在从句层次上,它们的语义已被很大程度上忽略,而在话语层次上,它们通常被视为各种副词所赋予的关系空间上的“信号”之光。我们进一步展示了如何将其谓词的论证结构和解释形式化并纳入丰富的话语中间模型中,其中只有其他模型将话语连接词视为谓词,其谓词必须指定和可恢复才能解释话语。然而,不仅由于副词的结构和解释,副词还被视为语篇连接词。我们的语料库包含一些副词,这些副词的语义本身并不能使它们相对于我们进行解释。我们探讨了为什么这些副词会引起话语语境对其进行解释的其他解释。特别是,我们展示了韵律与修饰S的状语的相互作用如何有助于话语连贯性,并且我们还展示了修饰S的状语如何可以用于传达暗示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号