首页> 外文学位 >Response and responsibility: On Levinas and moral education (Emmanuel Levinas).
【24h】

Response and responsibility: On Levinas and moral education (Emmanuel Levinas).

机译:回应和责任:关于列维纳斯和道德教育(Emmanuel Levinas)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Education has long been charged with the task of forming and shaping subjectivity and identity. A central concern of moral education, then, is the forming and shaping of moral identity, or moral agency. In this dissertation I focus on moral responsibility as a defining feature of moral agency. In contrast to the self-interestedness of the prevailing (modernist) view, I take as my starting point the ethical turn toward the other in postmodern and poststructuralist thought, focusing especially on the work of Emmanuel Levinas.; I begin by sketching out a number of formalized attempts to cultivate moral responsibility in North American public schools over the past 100 years. From this picture it becomes clear that, whether these approaches favour cognitive development (as in Kohlberg's stage theory) or moral behaviour (as in character education), they all share a commitment to the same modernist conception of moral responsibility as derivative of sovereign rational autonomy. In the next chapter I discuss the difficulties and limitations of this view, namely that it permits only a thin conception of responsibility to and for the other. I then explore Levinas's conception of subjectivity as always already constituted by ethical responsibility to and for the other, and point toward some ways in which reframing responsibility and subjectivity along this line might offer new possibilities for conceiving moral agency in education. Finally, I address the implications of this framework for teaching and teacher education.
机译:教育长期以来一直担负着形成和塑造主体性和身份的任务。因此,道德教育的核心问题是道德身份或道德代理的形成和塑造。在本文中,我将道德责任作为道德代理的定义特征。与普遍的(现代主义)观点的自私性相反,我以在后现代主义和后结构主义思想中转向另一个的伦理转向作为我的出发点,尤其侧重于莱昂纳斯的著作。首先,我勾勒出过去100年中在北美公立学校中培养道德责任感的许多形式化尝试。从这张照片可以清楚地看出,无论这些方法是支持认知发展(如科尔伯格的舞台理论)还是道德行为(如品格教育),它们都对作为主权理性自主权派生的现代道德责任概念有着共同的承诺。 。在下一章中,我将讨论这种观点的困难和局限性,即它只允许对彼此负责。然后,我将探讨列维纳斯的主体性概念,这种主体性一直是由对他人的道德责任构成的,并指出了一些沿此路线重新界定责任和主体性的方法可能会为接受教育中的道德代理提供新的可能性。最后,我讨论了该框架对教学和教师教育的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chinnery, Ann Helen.;

  • 作者单位

    Simon Fraser University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Simon Fraser University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Education Philosophy of.; Education Teacher Training.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 163 p.
  • 总页数 163
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;教师;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:49

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号