首页> 外文学位 >A Gadamerian approach to the natural sciences and objectivity: Theory, practice and progress.
【24h】

A Gadamerian approach to the natural sciences and objectivity: Theory, practice and progress.

机译:伽达默尔式的自然科学方法和客观方法:理论,实践和进步。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis is a hermeneutical project that lays the groundwork for a dialogue with the natural sciences. It does so through a reconstruction of the self-understandings of the natural sciences and Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics that embody how each thinks the limits, possibilities, and goals of human understanding. To those ends I shall rely upon four principal concepts that condition the different natures of hermeneutics and science: theory, practice, objectivism and progress. Through an examination and application of these core concepts I will first identify and then develop the main points of contact and conflict between hermeneutics and the natural sciences. Finally, I shall articulate their agreements and disagreements through a conceptual and practical analysis that culminates in an illustrative discussion on time and temporal experience. This discussion on time is an especially informative section for it draws out a persuasive hermeneutical view of time that is not objective in the current scientific use of the term. This project is accomplished with the ultimate aim of showing that the positive future of science is a hermeneutic-dialogical one. By appreciating the hermeneutical nature of its own self-understanding, the natural sciences will become more themselves as they find further freedom from the inhibiting ethos of dogmatic objectivism. This study identifies the need for a redefinition of what we consider most real about the world as inseparable from our concrete-practical experiences of it.
机译:本论文是一个解释学项目,为与自然科学对话奠定了基础。它通过对自然科学的自我理解和伽达默尔哲学诠释学的重构来实现的,这些诠释学体现了每个人如何思考人类理解的极限,可能性和目标。为此,我将依靠四个主要概念来解释诠释学和科学的不同性质:理论,实践,客观主义和进步。通过检查和应用这些核心概念,我将首先确定然后发展诠释学与自然科学之间的接触和冲突的要点。最后,我将通过概念和实践分析阐明他们的协议和分歧,最后将对时间和时间经验进行说明性讨论。关于时间的讨论特别有用,因为它提出了一种有说服力的时间解释学观点,这种观点在当前科学使用该术语中并不客观。完成该项目的最终目的是表明科学的积极未来是一种解释-对话学。通过欣赏自身理解的解释学性质,自然科学将变得更加独立,因为它们从教条主义客观主义的抑制精神中获得了进一步的自由。这项研究表明,有必要重新定义我们认为最真实的世界,这与我们的具体实践经验密不可分。

著录项

  • 作者

    Robinson, Jason C.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Guelph (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Guelph (Canada).;
  • 学科 Religion Philosophy of.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 242 p.
  • 总页数 242
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:46

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号