首页> 外文学位 >Combining biomarkers and clinicopathologic factors for prediction of response to adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: Cox model and Support Vector Machine (SVM) methods.
【24h】

Combining biomarkers and clinicopathologic factors for prediction of response to adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: Cox model and Support Vector Machine (SVM) methods.

机译:结合生物标志物和临床病理因素预测乳腺癌对辅助化疗的反应:Cox模型和支持向量机(SVM)方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background. Breast cancer is a complex disease, both phenotypically and etiologically. Accordingly, the responses to various treatments in the adjuvant setting among individuals vary considerably. There is a demand for tools that can distinguish patients who may benefit or may suffer from particular systemic treatments. We hypothesized that combination of data on genetic biomarkers with data from traditional clinical and pathophysiological (clinicopathologic) factors using traditional Cox model or Support Vector Machine (SVM) method, a new machine learning method, may provide a better tool for prediction of benefits to chemotherapy for the treatment of early breast cancer than using either biomarker or clinicopathologic data alone.;Results. None of the prognostic indices developed were found to have significant predictive value, although the prognostic index developed using SVM method based on only biomarkers yielded a marginal significant p-value (p=0.0527) for the interaction between classifier and treatment. In accordance with results published previously, the interaction between the classifier developed based on HER2 or TOP2A and treatment was significant (p=0.02 and 0.04 respectively). Comparisons based on the bootstrap approach indicate classifiers developed based on SVM performed better than those based on the Cox model method.;Conclusions. Combination of data using biomarkers and clinical-pathological factors, and using either the traditional COX model method or the new machine learning method was not shown to perform better than two single previously known biomarkers in prediction of response to CEF treatment for early breast cancer.;Methods. This project included 531 patients from NCIC-CTG MA.5 trial who had data on both clinicopathologic factors, such as age, tumor size, ER status, type of surgery, tumor grade and lymph node involvement, and biomarkers assayed on tissue microarrays (TMAs), including HER2, p53, CA9, MEP21, clusterin, pAKT, COX2 and TOP2A. The Cox model and SVM methods were used to develop prognostic indices for relapse-free or overall survival with either data from TMAs and clinicopathologic assessments alone or their combination. The prognostic indices developed were then examined for their value as predictive classifiers for benefits from CEF treatment. The power of the predictive classifiers derived was evaluated and compared using the bootstrap approach.
机译:背景。从表型和病因上讲,乳腺癌是一种复杂的疾病。因此,个体对佐剂环境中的各种治疗的反应差异很大。需要能够区分可能受益于或可能遭受特定全身治疗的患者的工具。我们假设使用传统的Cox模型或一种新的机器学习方法支持向量机(SVM)方法,将遗传生物标志物的数据与传统临床和病理生理(临床病理)因素的数据相结合,可能会提供更好的预测化学疗法获益的工具比起单独使用生物标志物或临床病理数据来治疗早期乳腺癌而言;结果。尽管仅基于生物标志物使用SVM方法开发的预后指标对于分类器和治疗之间的相互作用产生了很小的显着p值(p = 0.0527),但没有发现开发的预后指标具有明显的预测价值。根据先前发表的结果,基于HER2或TOP2A开发的分类器与治疗之间的相互作用显着(分别为p = 0.02和0.04)。基于自举方法的比较表明,基于支持向量机开发的分类器的性能要优于基于Cox模型方法的分类器。结合使用生物标记和临床病理因素的数据,以及使用传统的COX模型方法或新的机器学习方法,在预测早期乳腺癌对CEF治疗的反应方面,其表现均不如两个先前已知的生物标记更好。方法。该项目包括来自NCIC-CTG MA.5试验的531名患者,他们均具有临床病理因素的数据,例如年龄,肿瘤大小,ER状态,手术类型,肿瘤等级和淋巴结受累以及在组织微阵列(TMA)上测定的生物标志物),包括HER2,p53,CA9,MEP21,clusterin,pAKT,COX2和TOP2A。使用Cox模型和SVM方法通过单独的TMA和临床病理学评估数据或它们的组合来开发无复发或总体生存的预后指标。然后检查制定的预后指标作为CEF治疗获益的预测分类器的价值。使用引导方法评估并比较了得出的预测分类器的功能。

著录项

  • 作者

    Liu, Xudong.;

  • 作者单位

    Queen's University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Queen's University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Public Health.;Health Sciences Oncology.
  • 学位 M.Sc.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 110 p.
  • 总页数 110
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号