首页> 外文学位 >Unaccusativity and neurocognitive indices of second language acquisition: An ERP study.
【24h】

Unaccusativity and neurocognitive indices of second language acquisition: An ERP study.

机译:第二语言习得的不顺应性和神经认知指数:一项ERP研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Increased second-language (L2) proficiency is associated with a shift from explicit to implicit processing; however, the neural underpinnings are of this shift are not well understood. Furthermore, it is known that unaccusative verbs cause persistent difficulties in L2 learning. In this study, behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) responses to grammatical and ungrammatical sentences involving unergative and unaccusative verbs, in native and L2 English speakers, were examined in order to investigate whether neural responses changed with increasing proficiency, and to seek evidence regarding Oshita's (1997) Unaccusative Trap Hypothesis. Native English speakers and three groups of Chinese learners of English at different levels of grammatical knowledge (low, mid, high) were shown grammatical sentences containing passive, unergative, or unaccusative verbs, and ungrammatical sentences containing incorrectly passivized unaccusative and unergative verbs. Event-Related Potentials derived from high-density electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings revealed no systematic differences between unaccusatives and unergatives for the native speakers; however, the three learner groups all showed different responses to the verb manipulation. Native speakers revealed a left anterior negativity (LAN) to ungrammatical conditions, followed by a ramplike negativity (the N400/700). However, the three learner groups showed an N180 peak over parietal sensors bilaterally, greatest in amplitude for low-proficiency learners and attenuated for middle and high proficiency learners. Furthermore, a grammaticality effect was seen in the Chinese High and Chinese Low groups, with higher N180 amplitudes associated with grammatical sentences. The N180 is associated with visual working memory, which suggests that non-native speakers recruit non-linguistic mechanisms for L2 processing. These findings indicate that N180 attenuation, together with a shift towards anterior and left-lateralized processing, may provide an index of increased L2 proficiency. In addition, while there was weak behavioral support for the Unaccusative Trap Hypothesis, the ERP results did not reveal a distinction between the processing of unaccusative and unergative sentences.
机译:第二语言(L2)水平的提高与从显式处理到隐式处理的转变相关;然而,这种转变的神经基础尚未得到很好的理解。此外,众所周知,非宾格动词在L2学习中会引起持续的困难。在这项研究中,研究了母语为英语和母语为L2的英语者对涉及不加格和不加格动词的语法和不加语法动词的行为和事件相关电位(ERP)反应,以调查神经反应是否随着熟练程度的提高而变化,并寻求证据关于Oshita(1997)的非宾格陷阱假说。母语为英语的母语者和三组英语学习者在不同的语法知识水平(低,中,高),显示的语法句子中包含被动,不平抑或不宾格的动词,而语法不清的句子包含不正确地钝化的非宾格和不加格的动词。从高密度脑电图(EEG)记录中得出的与事件相关的电位表明,以母语为母语的人在非宾格和非格宾之间没有系统的差异。然而,这三个学习者群体对动词操纵的反应都不同。母语为非语法状态的人显示左前阴性(LAN),然后是斜坡状阴性(N400 / 700)。但是,这三个学习者组在两侧的顶壁传感器上均显示出一个N180峰值,对于低水平学习者而言幅度最大,而对于中高水平学习者则减弱。此外,在汉语高位和汉语低位组中发现了语法效果,其中较高的N180幅度与语法句子相关。 N180与视觉工作记忆有关,这表明非母语人士会采用非语言机制进行L2处理。这些发现表明,N180衰减以及向前处理和左边缘处理的转移可能会提供提高L2水平的指标。此外,尽管对非宾格陷阱假说的行为支持较弱,但ERP结果并未揭示对非宾格陷阱和非格句子的处理之间的区别。

著录项

  • 作者

    Purdy, John David.;

  • 作者单位

    Teachers College, Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Teachers College, Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Language Linguistics.;Biology Neuroscience.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 315 p.
  • 总页数 315
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号