首页> 外文学位 >Considering Race in Graduate Admissions: Have Statewide Affirmative Action Bans Reduced The Rates At Which Students of Color Enroll in Graduate Programs?
【24h】

Considering Race in Graduate Admissions: Have Statewide Affirmative Action Bans Reduced The Rates At Which Students of Color Enroll in Graduate Programs?

机译:考虑研究生入学竞赛:全州平权行动禁令是否降低了有色学生入读研究生课程的比例?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Graduate education is a key pathway to important areas of influence in our nation and the training ground for acquiring the specialized knowledge critical to individual, national, and global economic success. Yet, students of color remain severely underrepresented in graduate studies. Moreover, statewide affirmative action bans in six states threaten the ability of postsecondary institutions to address this underrepresentation by prohibiting race-conscious admissions policies. Prior studies have documented reductions in student of color enrollment at undergraduate institutions after bans on affirmative action, with similar effects at schools of law and medicine, but there is no research on how such bans have influenced enrollment in graduate programs. In this study, with a methodology that supports causal inference, I use data from the CGS/GRE Survey of Graduate Enrollment and Degrees to examine whether bans on affirmative action across four states Texas, California, Washington and Florida---have reduced the enrollment of underrepresented students of color in a cross-section of graduate fields: natural sciences, engineering, social sciences, business, education, and humanities. I find that the bans have reduced the average proportion of graduate students who are students of color by about 12.2 percent across all six fields of study. Within specific fields of study, affirmative action bans have led to about a 26-percent statistically significant reduction in the mean proportion of all graduate students enrolled in engineering who are students of color; a 19-percent decline in the natural sciences; a 15.7-percent drop in the social sciences, and a 11.8-percent drop in the humanities. I also find about a 13-percent decline in student of color representation in the education field, though the effect is only marginally statistically significant. There appears to be no impact in the field of business.
机译:研究生教育是通往美国重要影响领域的关键途径,也是获得对个人,国家和全球经济成功至关重要的专业知识的培训基地。然而,有色人种的学生在研究生学习中仍然严重不足。此外,六个州的全州平权行动禁令威胁到高等教育机构通过禁止具有种族意识的录取政策来解决这一代表性不足的能力。先前的研究表明,在禁止平权行动之后,本科院校的有色学生减少了,在法学院和医学院也有类似的影响,但是目前还没有关于这种禁令如何影响研究生课程入学的研究。在这项研究中,我使用了一种支持因果推理的方法,使用了CGS / GRE研究生入学和学位调查得出的数据来检验德克萨斯州,加利福尼亚州,华盛顿州和佛罗里达州四个州是否禁止平权行动-减少了入学率在自然科学,工程学,社会科学,商业,教育和人文科学等不同领域的研究生中,有色学生的代表性不足。我发现,在所有六个研究领域中,禁令将有色学生的平均比例降低了约12.2%。在特定的研究领域内,平权行动禁令已导致有色工程专业的所有在读研究生的平均比例下降了26%,具有统计学意义。自然科学下降了19%;社会科学领域下降了15.7%,人文学科领域下降了11.8%。我还发现,在教育领域,色彩代表学生的数量下降了13%,尽管这种影响在统计上仅微不足道。在业务领域似乎没有影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Garces, Liliana M.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Higher education.;Multicultural Education.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 78 p.
  • 总页数 78
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号