首页> 外文学位 >A Study on the Min School of Tongguang ti.
【24h】

A Study on the Min School of Tongguang ti.

机译:桐广民学派研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Min School of Tongguang ti was one of the regional schools of Tongguang ti poetry. In works of Chinese literary history, Tongguang ti has all along been treated as a whole. The focus of related studies has also been on the Guangxu and Xuantong period as well as few important poets such as Chen Yan, Chen Sanli, Shen Zengzhi, and Zheng Xiaoxu. Although scholars like Qian Zhonglian had brought up the idea of poetry schools division within Tongguang ti, and had preliminary discussions on the Min School, a comprehensive study of the Min School and, in particular, an investigation of its situation during the later period are still lacking. This thesis strives to launch a comprehensive study on the Min School of Tongguang ti. With reference to the then general political and cultural background, as well as the local culture and poetic tradition, we would reveal the course of formation and development, poetic ideas and artistic characteristics of the Min School, and its influence on the modern and contemporary worlds of poetry. A significant part is also dedicated to explore the development of the Min School during its later period, which is seldom discussed by former scholars.;This thesis contains eight chapters. The first chapter defines the concept and nature of the Min School, and, with the help of previous studies, further identifies 123 fundamental members of Min School as targets of our study.;Instead of using a general perspective of literary history, Chapters Two to Four approach the formation and development of the Min School in terms of regional consciousness, family education, marital ties and literary activities. Chapter Two puts forward the idea that the establishment of Min School rests on the concept of sectarian consciousness suggested by Chen Yan's poetics, although he did not explicitly propose the title "Min School". By conducting statistic and poetic analyses, this chapter illustrates that Shiyishi shihua and Jindai shichao by Chen Yan are not only, as commonly believed by scholars, modern notes on poetry and poetry anthologies, but also reflect a distinct regional consciousness. Chapter Three reveals the kinship and poetic inheritance among the key poets of the Min School, namely Chen Yan, Chen Baochen, Zheng Xiaoxu, Shen Yuqing, Guo Zengxin, and Zeng Keduan. This chapter specially uses two neglected family collections, Houguan Guo shi jiaji huike and Eli Zeng shi shiyishi shi , as examples to unravel the hidden internal clan ties and the unique way of family poetic inheritance. Chapter Four elaborates the general characteristics of the Min School and the development of Song-advocating poetic belief, by referring to the poetic activities in Fuzhou and Peking. A special study on the renovation and increased worship of Fuzhou wanzai tang poetry niche during the early Republican period, the establishment of Shuoshishe, and Shuoshishe shilu is conducted to reveal the development and the distinct regional consciousness of the Min School in Fuzhou.;Chapters Five and Six study the uniqueness of Min School's poetics and poems, and its relation to the culture of Min poetics. Chapter Five discusses the poetic views of Min School from three aspects, namely the poetic views of Tang and Song dynasties, integration of scholastic and poetic poems, and bianfeng bianya (the Airs and Elegantiae of a stage of change). It points out that the "Sanyuan Theory" of Min School is unique in the sense that it advocated the Song poetry, and at the same time took reference of the Tang poetry. The so-called "essence of Song poetry" actually means the Song poems which integrate the Tang and Song poetic styles, but not only the modern-style poems of Song Dynasty. Therefore, Min School's idea of integration of Tang and Song is not only about the poetics advocated, but also the poetic style. Chapter Six explains and compares the qingcang youqiao style of the Min School with the shenyou guqiaostyle of the Jingling School, revealing the adoption of both Tang and Song poetics and the geographical origin of Min School.;Chapter Seven discusses the situation of Min School in the later period, a topic rarely talked about in academia. This chapter examines the poetic activities of Min School poets in places like Fuzhou, Shanghai, Beijing and Hong Kong in the later period. Centering on such neglected poetic works as Shuoguoting Chongjiu chouchang ji by Li Xuangong, Yangjuge shi by Liang Hongzhi, Lingfengyi shi by Huang Chun and Songjulu shi by Zeng Keduang, it also investigates the passing on and development of Min School's Song-advocating poetics in this period. Attention is also drawn to the poetics and poems of Huang Jun and Liang Hongzhi, who were referred to as traitors. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).
机译:桐广民俗学校是桐广民俗诗的地方流派之一。在中国文学史著作中,《通光》一向被视为一个整体。相关研究的焦点也集中在光绪和宣统时期,以及一些重要的诗人,如陈衍,陈三立,沉增智和郑小旭。尽管像钱仲联这样的学者提出了通光帝内的诗派划分的思想,并对闽派进行了初步讨论,但对闽派的综合研究,尤其是对后期情况的调查仍在进行。不足。本文力求对通光敏民学校进行全面的研究。参照当时的总体政治和文化背景,以及当地的文化和诗歌传统,我们将揭示闽派的形成和发展历程,诗歌思想和艺术特色,以及它对近现代世界的影响。诗歌相当一部分也致力于探索闽派学校的后期发展,这在以前的学者中很少讨论。本论文共八章。第一章定义了闽语学校的概念和性质,并在以前的研究的帮助下,进一步确定了闽语学校的123名基本成员作为我们学习的目标。在区域意识,家庭教育,婚姻关系和文学活动方面,有四种途径来探讨闽语学校的形成和发展。第二章提出陈School诗学提出的宗派意识的思想,即he学派的建立,尽管他并未明确提出“ Min学派”的名称。通过统计分析和诗学分析,本章说明,陈衍的《释义诗话》和《金代诗照》不仅像学者们普遍相信的那样,是关于诗歌和诗选集的现代注解,而且反映出独特的地域意识。第三章揭示了闽派主要诗人陈岩,陈宝臣,郑小绪,沉玉清,郭增新和曾克端之间的亲属关系和诗学传承。本章专门以后官郭氏家族集会和以利增施氏家族一世的两个被忽视的家族收藏为例,来揭示隐藏的内部家族联系和家族诗歌继承的独特方式。第四章通过在福州和北京的诗歌活动,阐述闽语学派的一般特征和崇尚宋代诗学信仰的发展。对民国初年福州万载唐诗利基的整修和增加崇拜,硕果社和硕士社十路的建立进行了专门研究,以揭示福州闽派学校的发展和独特的区域意识。第五章第六部分研究闽派诗学和诗歌的独特性,以及与闽派诗学文化的关系。第五章从唐宋诗论,学诗诗融合,变风变雅(三个阶段)三个方面论述闽学的诗观。指出闽派的“三元论”在倡导宋诗的意义上是独特的,同时又借鉴了唐诗。所谓“宋诗本质”,实际上是指融合唐宋诗风的宋诗,不仅是宋代的现代诗。因此,闽派的唐宋融合思想,不仅关乎所倡导的诗学,而且关乎诗风。第六章对闽派的清仓右桥与金陵派的神游古桥风格进行了比较和比较,揭示了唐宋诗学的采用和闽派的地域渊源。第七章探讨了闽派的闽派情况。后期,学术界很少谈论这个话题。本章考察了闽派诗人后期在福州,上海,北京和香港等地的诗歌活动。以李宣功的《朔果亭重九选唱集》,梁鸿志的《杨举阁史》,黄春的《凌风翼》,曾克光的《宋菊露》等被忽视的诗作为中心,在此基础上考察闽派崇尚诗学的传承与发展。期。人们还注意到被称为叛徒的黄军和梁宏志的诗学和诗歌。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wong, Siu Yung.;

  • 作者单位

    The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;

  • 授予单位 The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;
  • 学科 Literature Classical.;Literature Asian.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 443 p.
  • 总页数 443
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号