首页> 外文学位 >Individual differences modulate neural responses during emotional reactivity and regulation.
【24h】

Individual differences modulate neural responses during emotional reactivity and regulation.

机译:个体差异调节情绪反应和调节过程中的神经反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Identifying biological pathways that underlie individual differences in emotional reactivity and regulation may help to clarify how such differences confer vulnerability to psychiatric disease. This dissertation examines the role of individual differences in (1) emotion regulation usage (reappraisal), (2) personality (neuroticism), and (3) genetics (5-HTTLPR), and how they impact neural substrates of emotional reactivity and regulation using a multi-method approach.;Study 1 used blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine whether individual differences in reappraisal use predict neural responses when individuals are confronted with negative images. Fifty-six healthy women completed an fMRI challenge paradigm involving the perceptual processing of emotionally negative facial expressions and provided measures of typical emotion regulation use. Results showed that greater use of reappraisal in everyday life was related to decreased amygdala activity and increased prefrontal and parietal activity during the processing of negative emotional facial expressions. These findings suggest that individual differences in reappraisal use are associated with decreased activation in ventral emotion generative regions and increased activation in prefrontal control regions in response to negative stimuli. Such individual differences in emotion regulation may predict successful coping with emotional challenges as well as the onset of affective disorders.;Study 2 examined the biobehavioral impact of varying levels of anticipatory anxiety, using a shock anticipation task in which unpredictable electric shocks were threatened and delivered to the wrist at variable intervals and intensities (safe, medium, strong). This permitted investigation of a dynamic range of anticipatory anxiety responses. In two experiments, 95 and 51 healthy female participants, respectively, underwent this shock anticipation task while providing continuous ratings of anxiety experience and electrodermal responding (Experiment A) and during BOLD fMRI neuroimaging (Experiment B). Results indicated a step-wise pattern of responding in anxiety experience, electrodermal responses, and neural activity. These responses were modulated by individual differences in neuroticism, such that those high in neuroticism showed exaggerated anxiety experience across the entire task, and reduced brain activation from medium to strong trials in a subset of brain regions. These findings suggest that individual differences in neuroticism may influence sensitivity to anticipatory threat and provide new insights into the mechanism through which neuroticism may confer risk for developing anxiety disorders via dysregulated anticipatory responses.;Study 3 investigated whether differences in 5-HTTLPR genotype impacted neural responses to the threat task developed in Study 2. While many studies have shown that 5--HTTLPR genotype interacts with exposure to stress in conferring risk for psychopathology, the specific neural mechanisms through which this gene by environment interaction confers risk remain largely unknown. Relative to those carrying the L allele, SS homozygotes showed enhanced activation during threat anticipation in a network of regions including amygdala, hippocampus, anterior insula, thalamus, pulvinar, caudate, precuneus, anterior cingulate, and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC). SS homozygotes also displayed enhanced positive coupling between dmPFC activation and anxiety experience, whereas individuals carrying the L allele displayed enhanced negative coupling between insula activation and perceived success at regulating anxiety. Taken together, the present findings suggest that, when exposed to stress, SS homozygotes may preferentially engage neural systems which enhance fear and arousal, modulate attention toward threat, and perseverate on emotional salience of the threat. In turn, this may be a mechanism underlying risk for psychopathology conferred by the S allele upon exposure to life stressors.
机译:找出引起情绪反应和调节个体差异的生物学途径可能有助于阐明这种差异如何导致易患精神病。本文研究了个体差异在(1)情绪调节用法(重新评估),(2)人格(神经病)和(3)遗传学(5-HTTLPR)中的作用,以及它们如何影响情绪反应和调节的神经基础研究1使用血液氧水平依赖性(BOLD)功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来检查当个体面对阴性图像时,重新评估使用中的个体差异是否能预测神经反应。五十六名健康女性完成了功能磁共振成像挑战范例,涉及情感否定的面部表情的知觉处理,并提供了典型的情绪调节使用量度。结果表明,在日常生活中更多地使用重新评估与减少情绪面部表情的过程中杏仁核活动的减少以及额叶和顶叶活动的增加有关。这些发现表明,重新评估使用中的个体差异与腹侧情绪生成区域的激活减少以及响应负刺激的前额叶控制区域的激活增加有关。情绪调节中的这种个体差异可能预示着成功应对情绪挑战以及情感障碍的发作。研究2使用电击威胁任务来预测和交付不可预测的电击,研究了不同程度的预期焦虑对生物行为的影响。以可变的时间间隔和强度(安全,中等,强壮)到达手腕。这允许调查预期的焦虑反应的动态范围。在两个实验中,分别有95和51个健康的女性参与者接受了这种休克预期任务,同时对焦虑经历和皮肤电反应(实验A)和BOLD fMRI神经成像(实验B)进行了连续评估。结果表明在焦虑经历,皮肤电反应和神经活动方面有逐步反应。这些反应是由神经质的个体差异所调节的,因此神经质高的人在整个任务中表现出过大的焦虑经验,并且在部分大脑区域中,从中等试验到强试验的大脑激活程度有所降低。这些发现表明,神经质的个体差异可能会影响对预期威胁的敏感性,并为神经质通过预期失调的预期反应赋予发展焦虑症风险的机制提供新见解。研究3研究了5-HTTLPR基因型差异是否影响神经反应。研究2中提出的威胁任务。尽管许多研究表明5--HTTLPR基因型与暴露于压力下相互作用,从而赋予了心理病理风险,但通过环境相互作用该基因赋予风险的具体神经机制仍然未知。相对于携带L等位基因的人,SS纯合子在威胁预测期间在包括杏仁核,海马,前岛,丘脑,丘脑,尾状,尾丘,前扣带和前背额叶皮层(dmPFC)的区域网络中显示出增强的激活作用。 SS纯合子在dmPFC激活和焦虑体验之间还显示出增强的正耦合,而携带L等位基因的个体在孤立激活和感知到的成功调节焦虑上显示出增强的负耦合。综上所述,目前的发现表明,SS纯合子在受到压力时可以优先参与神经系统,从而增强恐惧和唤醒感,调节对威胁的注意力,并在威胁的情感上表现出持久性。反过来,这可能是暴露于生活压力源时S等位基因赋予心理病理风险的潜在机制。

著录项

  • 作者

    Drabant, Emily Marguerite.;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford University.;

  • 授予单位 Stanford University.;
  • 学科 Biology Neuroscience.;Psychology Psychobiology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 121 p.
  • 总页数 121
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:28

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号