首页> 外文学位 >Global Institutionalization of Human Rights: The Effects of State Institutions and Domestic Politics.
【24h】

Global Institutionalization of Human Rights: The Effects of State Institutions and Domestic Politics.

机译:全球人权制度化:国家制度和国内政治的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation investigates the causes and mechanisms driving the global institutionalization of human rights since the end of World War II. This project studies two indispensable components of this institutionalization, the intergovernmental treaty system and the non-governmental organization (NGO) field. I address two central questions: how human rights are institutionalized into an international regime, and why this institutionalization process occurs unevenly across the world. This study develops a state-oriented theoretical approach which emphasizes the role of the state, and employs various statistical tools to test this approach. I argue that the institutional composition of the state and domestic politics are key to understanding the institutionalization process and its unequal nature.;Specific findings can be summarized as follows. (1) The establishment of the human rights treaty system is mainly driven by states undergoing democratization through the "commitment" and "concession" mechanisms within domestic politics that intensify states' tendency to support global legalization of human rights. Through treaty ratification, these democratizing states forestall future repression, make necessary critical concessions to newly empowered political groups, lock in positive institutional changes achieved in democratization, and render their commitments to continuing democratization more credible to the domestic audience. (2) Cross-national inequality in participation in human rights NGOs is best explained by two intertwined dimensions within the state, democracy and state capacity. Civic participation in human rights NGOs is mostly supported by strong democratic states and tolerated by weak states, while strong authoritarian states have both the motive and capacity to restrain their citizens' participation. (3) Cross-national inequality in creation of human rights NGOs can be attributed to inequality in domestic (economic, human, and political) resources, world polity connections, and American exceptionalism. Notably, a well-established democracy with a strong democratic tradition provides favorable environment for human rights association activities.;Overall, this dissertation explains the global institutionalization of human rights from a state-oriented perspective, and has broad implications for theories of institutionalization of global norms, for the debate on the role of the state in the world polity, and for effective promotion of human rights in countries with differing state regimes and political institutions.
机译:本文探讨了自第二次世界大战以来推动全球人权制度化的原因和机制。该项目研究了这种制度化的两个必不可少的组成部分,即政府间条约体系和非政府组织领域。我要解决两个核心问题:如何将人权制度化为国际制度,以及为什么这种制度化进程在世界各地发生不平衡。这项研究开发了一种以国家为导向的理论方法,该方法强调了国家的作用,并使用各种统计工具来检验这种方法。我认为,国家和国内政治的制度组成是理解制度化过程及其不平等性质的关键。具体结论可以归纳如下。 (1)建立人权条约体系的主要动力是国家通过国内政治中的“承诺”和“让步”机制进行民主化,从而加剧了各国支持全球人权合法化的趋势。通过批准条约,这些民主化国家阻止了未来的镇压,对新授权的政治团体作出了必要的重大让步,锁定了民主化过程中取得的积极的体制变革,并使他们对继续民主化的承诺对国内听众来说更加可信。 (2)跨国家非政府组织参与人权的不平等最好用国家内部两个相互交织的维度来解释,即民主和国家能力。公民对人权非政府组织的参与主要是由强大的民主国家支持和由弱小的国家容忍的,而强大的独裁国家既有动机也有能力限制其公民的参与。 (3)创建人权方面的跨国不平等NGO可以归因于国内(经济,人力和政治)资源,世界政治联系和美国例外主义的不平等。值得注意的是,建立有良好民主传统的民主国家为人权协会的活动提供了良好的环境。总体而言,本论文从国家主导的角度解释了全球人权的制度化,对全球人权的制度化理论具有广泛的意义。规范,关于国家在世界政治中的作用的辩论以及在具有不同国家体制和政治制度的国家中有效促进人权的规范。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zhou, Min.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.;Sociology Social Structure and Development.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 228 p.
  • 总页数 228
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号