首页> 外文学位 >A View of Perception through Kantian Lenses: Toward a Reanalysis of Kant's Practical Philosophy in the Light of His Theoretical Assertions.
【24h】

A View of Perception through Kantian Lenses: Toward a Reanalysis of Kant's Practical Philosophy in the Light of His Theoretical Assertions.

机译:康德镜头的感知观:根据康德的理论断言重新分析康德的实践哲学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In much of the same manner as Copernicus, Immanuel Kant provides for us a revolutionary way of conceptualizing being that shakes theoretical foundations along with having a very significant impact on practical matters. Kant tells us that: "Up to now it has been assumed that all our cognition must conform to the objects...." Instead, what Kant suggests is that we must consider whether objects must conform to our cognition in attempting to understand both the self and objects. One can see from this that perception, for Kant, must take more of a cognitive role than more traditional stances. Perceptive capacities do not conform to the dimensions of what catch it, but catch only what conforms to the dimensions of cognition. From this, one can see a potential problem with Kant's theoretical assertions when considering Kant's practical thinking. Kant practical thinking insists that rational beings are to be treated as ends, never as means, and that any of our maxims are pursuable if and only if they can be followed by every other rational being. Yet, under the doctrine of objects conforming to cognition, how will rational beings be said to get beyond the subjectivity of their own individual cognition with regard to the recognition of humans in the order of fulfilling their practical demands? This is not a problem for the traditional view, as the rational being, in some way, conforms to the object. And as such, fulfilling practical obligations is a matter of recognizing what is there—a process of allowing one's perceptive faculty to conform to what is objectively beyond it. What is needed, in Kant's case however, is a way to get from the purely subjective nature of his theoretical assertions to the objectively necessary structure of his practical ones by way of perception.
机译:与哥白尼大体相同,伊曼纽尔·康德(Immanuel Kant)为我们提供了一种革命性的概念化存在方式,它不仅动摇了理论基础,而且对实际问题产生了重大影响。康德告诉我们:“到目前为止,我们一直假设我们所有的认知都必须符合物体……。”相反,康德建议的是,在试图理解物体和物体时,我们必须考虑物体是否必须符合我们的认知。自我和对象。从中可以看出,对于康德而言,感知必须比传统姿态更多地发挥认知作用。知觉能力不符合捕捉它的维度,而仅捕捉符合认知的维度。由此,在考虑康德的实践思想时,可以看到康德的理论主张存在潜在的问题。康德的实践思想坚持认为,理性的存在应被视为目的,而不是手段,并且我们的任何格言只有当所有其他理性存在都可以被遵循时,才可以追求。但是,在符合认知的客体学说下,理性人将如何满足人类的实际需求,从而超越他们自己的个人认知的主观性?对于传统观点而言,这不是问题,因为理性在某种程度上与对象相符。因此,履行实际义务是认识存在的问题的一种方法,即允许一个人的感知能力符合客观上超出其范围的过程。然而,在康德的情况下,所需要的是一种通过感知从他的理论断言的纯粹主观性质转变为他的实际断言的客观必要结构的方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Barnes, Corey L.;

  • 作者单位

    Howard University.;

  • 授予单位 Howard University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 67 p.
  • 总页数 67
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:22

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号