首页> 外文学位 >We --- For the other: Solidarity as an enactment of ethical-empathetic subjectivity (an analysis of the philosophical projects of Emmanuel Levinas and Edith Stein, and the concept of solidarity).
【24h】

We --- For the other: Solidarity as an enactment of ethical-empathetic subjectivity (an analysis of the philosophical projects of Emmanuel Levinas and Edith Stein, and the concept of solidarity).

机译:我们---另一方面:团结是道德移情主观的制定(对伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯和伊迪丝·斯坦的哲学计划以及团结概念的分析)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

What does it mean to be a human person? How do we enact our humanity? These are the questions that run like a thread throughout this project. Eschewing Hamlet's famous question---To be or not to be?---this dissertation situates itself within the postmodern context, exploring the work of Emmanuel Levinas and his ethical presentation of the human person. Here we find the human person not concerned with his or her own state of being, but rather turning toward the other in ethical responsibility. However, Levinas' work presents us with a peculiar problem---this ethical encounter does not take place in the "real time" of justice, politics, work, and play. It is an anarchical encounter taking place in an immemorial past of which we can only sense a trace. Thus, to render his work accessible to our daily lives, I place Levinas' thought in dialogue with Edith Stein's understanding of the concept of empathy. I argue that the empathetic encounter with the other person is a turn to the other that avoids the reductive tendencies found in the ontological traditions of the West. This encounter allows and even demands that we enact our humanity from within the type of ethical context which Levinas insists makes us human. Furthermore, it is in this ethical-empathetic encounter with the other that one can be in relationship with God. We will see how this turn to the other is prayer, hence relationship with God, and lived spirituality. In conclusion, I argue that solidarity with others, especially with those who suffer and particularly with those who suffer from injustice, is the natural outcome of this ethical-empathetic enactment of the human person. Here we refer to the writings of Pope John Paul II, philosopher-theologian Jozef Tischner, and the tradition of Latin American Liberation Theology to explore the concept of solidarity within the Catholic social justice tradition.
机译:成为一个人意味着什么?我们如何制定我们的人性?这些问题在整个项目中像一个线程一样运行。避开哈姆雷特的著名问题-是否要成为?-本论文将其自身置于后现代语境中,探索伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯的作品以及他对人的道德表达。在这里,我们发现人与自己的状态无关,而是在道德责任方面转向另一人。但是,列维纳斯的作品为我们提出了一个特殊的问题-这种道德冲突不会发生在正义,政治,工作和娱乐的“实时”过程中。这是在不朽的过去中发生的无政府状态的相遇,我们只能感觉到痕迹。因此,为了使他的作品能够进入我们的日常生活,我将列维纳斯的思想与伊迪丝·斯坦因对同情概念的理解进行了对话。我认为与他人的移情相遇是另一方的回避,避免了西方本体论传统中存在的还原倾向。这次相遇允许甚至要求我们从列维纳斯坚持使我们成为人类的道德背景中演绎我们的人性。此外,正是在这种与他人的道德移情上相遇中,一个人才能与上帝建立关系。我们将看到转向另一侧的方式是祈祷,从而与上帝建立关系,并活出灵性。最后,我认为,与他人的团结,特别是与那些遭受苦难的人,特别是与遭受不公正待遇的人的团结,是这种人的道德移情行为的自然结果。这里我们参考教宗约翰·保罗二世,哲学神学家约瑟夫·蒂施纳的著作以及拉丁美洲解放神学的传统,以探索天主教社会正义传统中的团结概念。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kolano, Karen M.;

  • 作者单位

    Duquesne University.;

  • 授予单位 Duquesne University.;
  • 学科 Religion Philosophy of.;Theology.;Philosophy.;Ethics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 473 p.
  • 总页数 473
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号