首页> 外文学位 >Religion in liberal and republican public spheres: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints of the United States and the Gulen movement of Turkey.
【24h】

Religion in liberal and republican public spheres: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints of the United States and the Gulen movement of Turkey.

机译:自由派和共和派公共领域的宗教:美国后期圣徒的耶稣基督教堂和土耳其的古伦运动。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines the variety of strategies and approaches used by religious groups to organize, express and position themselves in a polity. I compare the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS) in the United States and the Gulen movement (GM) in Turkey as examples of modernist conservative movements. In spite of being strikingly similar in their strong fellowship ties, emphasis on conservative social values, and religious doctrine concerning political neutrality, these two religious entities employ very different political strategies to promote their goals and collective interests. The Mormons act as an assertive interest group in the pluralist "liberal" American public sphere by utilizing the already existing autonomous civil space in the United States. In contrast, the Gulen movement has been rather cautious and indirect in presenting itself in the "republican" Turkish public sphere. The movement affiliates employ a strategy of building coalitions with other social groups in order to expand the available civil space vis-a-vis the strong state in Turkey. The main thesis of the study is that the political context in both countries offers the most complete explanation of this puzzle compared to other alternatives: demographics, religious doctrine, or organizational factors. A combination of longitudinal and cross-national comparative method is used to evaluate the impact of different political contexts on the two groups' public activism along the three polity domains---the state, political society and civil society.
机译:这项研究考察了宗教团体用来组织,表达和定位自己的政体的各种策略和方法。我比较了美国的耶稣基督后期圣徒教会(LDS)和土耳其的古伦运动(GM)作为现代主义保守运动的例子。尽管这两个宗教实体在牢固的团契关系上有着惊人的相似,强调保守的社会价值以及关于政治中立的宗教学说,但它们采用截然不同的政治策略来促进其目标和集体利益。摩门教徒通过利用美国已经存在的自治民用空间,在多元化的“自由”美国公共领域中成为一个坚定的利益集团。相比之下,古伦运动在“共和”土耳其公共领域中表现得相当谨慎和间接。运动附属机构采取了与其他社会团体建立联盟的战略,以相对于土耳其强大的国家扩大可用的民用空间。该研究的主要论点是,与其他替代方案(人口统计学,宗教学说或组织因素)相比,两国的政治环境对这一难题提供了最完整的解释。纵向和跨国比较方法的结合用于评估不同政治背景对国家,政治社会和公民社会这三个政治领域对这两个群体的公共行动的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ugur, Etga.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Utah.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Utah.;
  • 学科 Religion General.;Political Science General.;Middle Eastern Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 243 p.
  • 总页数 243
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号