首页> 外文学位 >A multidimensional scaling analysis of perceptions of academic dishonesty among learning and grade-oriented students.
【24h】

A multidimensional scaling analysis of perceptions of academic dishonesty among learning and grade-oriented students.

机译:对学习和年级学生的学术不诚实感的多维尺度分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Academic dishonesty has remained an important and ever expanding area of research. However, as much ambiguity exists in some areas of this research, it remains imperative to continue investigating cheating behaviors. In the current study, perceptions of cheating were assessed indirectly using a multidimensional scaling analysis (MDS). Past research conducted using N OS to assess college students' cheating perceptions has found that students organize behaviors based on seriousness and type of task. However, prior research has not taken into account individual differences among students.; The individual differences examined currently pertain to students' learning and grade orientation. Learning orientation is the student's desire to be in class for the sake of learning. Grade orientation is the student's desire to be in class for the sake of getting good grades. Of the minimal research conducted linking orientation and cheating, a positive correlation has consistently been found between grade orientation and rates of cheating.; The goals of this research were to replicate prior findings and identify if differences in orientation account for differences in cheating perceptions. Tasks related to orientation and cheating were completed by 136 participants. The LOGO-II was completed to assess learning and grade orientation. Participants were then randomly assigned to complete a sorting task or rating scales, pertaining to cheating behaviors. The sorting task, the primary method to assess cheating perceptions, involved participants sorting academic behaviors into categories based on similarity. The rating scales were used to externally validate the NMS results and provide additional information regarding students' perceptions. All participants completed scales assessing their rates of cheating and their perceptions of their classmates' behaviors.; Results of the analyses replicated prior research and indicated that college students' perceptions of cheating are 2-dimensional. The first dimension, Tests vs. Papers, differentiated between behaviors based on the types of tasks being completed. The second dimension, Seriousness, differentiated between behaviors based on seriousness of violation of academic honesty. Further analyses determined that no statistically significant relationship exists between learning and grade orientation and cheating.
机译:学术不诚实一直是重要且不断扩大的研究领域。但是,由于本研究某些领域存在很多歧义,因此继续调查欺诈行为仍然势在必行。在当前的研究中,使用多维标度分析(MDS)间接评估了对作弊的看法。过去使用N OS评估大学生的作弊观念进行的研究发现,学生会根据工作的认真程度和任务类型来组织行为。但是,先前的研究并未考虑到学生之间的个体差异。当前检查的个体差异与学生的学习和年级倾向有关。学习导向是学生为了学习而上课的愿望。成绩导向是学生为获得良好成绩而渴望上课的愿望。在将取向和作弊联系起来的最少研究中,一直发现年级取向和作弊率之间存在正相关。这项研究的目的是复制以前的发现,并确定定向差异是否解释了作弊观念上的差异。 136位参与者完成了与定向和作弊有关的任务。 LOGO-II已完成以评估学习和年级倾向。然后将参与者随机分配以完成与作弊行为有关的排序任务或等级量表。排序任务是评估作弊观念的主要方法,它涉及参与者根据相似度将学术行为归类。评分量表用于外部验证NMS成绩并提供有关学生看法的其他信息。所有参与者完成了量表,评估了他们的作弊率和对同学行为的看法。分析结果重复了先前的研究,并表明大学生对作弊的感知是二维的。第一个维度是“测试与论文”,它基于要完成的任务的类型来区分行为。第二个维度,严重性,基于违反学术诚实的严重性来区分行为。进一步的分析确定,学习与年级定向和作弊之间不存在统计学上的显着关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Levine, Nicole Beth.;

  • 作者单位

    Hofstra University.;

  • 授予单位 Hofstra University.;
  • 学科 Education Educational Psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 196 p.
  • 总页数 196
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号