首页> 外文学位 >A descriptive assessment on the prevalence and qualitative characteristics of peer attention.
【24h】

A descriptive assessment on the prevalence and qualitative characteristics of peer attention.

机译:对同伴注意力的普遍性和定性特征的描述性评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Studies have shown that in some cases, peer attention can maintain students' problem behavior (e.g., Northup et. al., 1995). These studies tend to use confederate peers and similar topographies of attention across all participants (reprimands). Information on events that typically follow problem behavior in the natural environment may provide some empirical validation for the use of peer-delivered consequences during functional analyses. Thompson & Iwata (2001) conducted a descriptive assessment to determine what types of consequences typically follow problem behavior in the natural environment, and although attention was a relatively common consequence, they reported that peer attention was rarely observed. The current study consists of two descriptive assessments that focus on peer attention as a consequence in a middle-school classroom. The first descriptive assessment is an extension of the Thompson and Iwata (2001) study and consists of a study on the prevalence of peer attention as a consequence for problem behavior in a middle school classroom. The second descriptive assessment consists of a study on the topographies of peer attention provided in the natural environment. Results from the first study indicated that the probability of peer attention following problem behavior was greater than unconditional probability of peer attention for eight of the eleven students, suggesting that peer attention is a common consequence for the problem behavior of middle school children. The results from second study indicated that the topography of peer attention varied widely, but rarely included statements regarding the behavior or reprimands.
机译:研究表明,在某些情况下,同伴注意力可以维持学生的问题行为(例如,Northup等,1995)。这些研究倾向于在所有参与者中使用同盟同伴和类似的地形图(谴责)。有关在自然环境中通常遵循问题行为的事件的信息可以为功能分析期间使用同伴传递的结果提供一些经验验证。 Thompson&Iwata(2001)进行了描述性评估,以确定自然环境中问题行为通常遵循哪种类型的后果,尽管注意力是相对普遍的后果,但他们报告称很少观察到同伴的注意力。当前的研究包括两个描述性评估,重点放在中学课堂中的同伴注意力上。第一个描述性评估是Thompson和Iwata(2001)研究的扩展,包括对同伴注意力的普遍性作为中学课堂问题行为后果的研究。第二个描述性评估包括对自然环境中同伴注意的地形的研究。第一项研究的结果表明,11名学生中有8名学生出现问题行为后,同伴注意的可能性大于无条件的同伴注意的可能性,这表明同伴注意是中学生问题行为的普遍后果。第二项研究的结果表明,同伴注意的地形变化很大,但很少包括有关行为或谴责的陈述。

著录项

  • 作者

    Roberts, Kylie Marie.;

  • 作者单位

    Northeastern University.;

  • 授予单位 Northeastern University.;
  • 学科 Psychology Behavioral Sciences.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 31 p.
  • 总页数 31
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号