首页> 外文学位 >A Christian Augustinian response to the problem of evil in the Shinto religion with reference to the thought of Motoori Norinaga.
【24h】

A Christian Augustinian response to the problem of evil in the Shinto religion with reference to the thought of Motoori Norinaga.

机译:基督教的奥古斯丁式的对神道教信仰中的邪恶问题的回应,参考了本永信长的思想。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Despite great advances within the last few decades of Western scholarship concerning the indigenous Japanese religion, little has been written on the Shinto concept of evil. Given the overall optimistic Shinto attitude toward life, the purpose of this thesis was to analyze its view of evil with reference to Motoori Norinaga's thought in order to find out whether Shinto understands it in a realistic manner. Another aim was to compare Norinaga's position to a Christian Augustinian view to determine which one offers a more coherent and comprehensive answer to the challenge of evil. The thesis examined Norinaga's available writings and recent scholarly works of Shinto studies as well as Augustine and Christian scholars' works regarding the philosophical problem of evil. It was discovered that Norinaga's system, built on logical inconsistencies, failed to understand the depth of the challenge of evil in contrast to the Christian response that demonstrated a greater comprehension of the problem. The principal conclusion was that the overall image emerging from Norinaga and the Shinto writings concerning the concept of evil and the solution for its removal was rather grim: failing to offer a satisfactory explanation for either the origin of evil or the nature of good, Norinaga's Shinto portrayed the world in a deterministic way, under the influence of ambivalent kami while believing, at the same time, in the ultimate triumph of good over evil. The unfounded Shinto assurance was contrasted to the biblical perspective in which an all-knowing, all-powerful, and good God offers genuine hope.
机译:尽管在西方学者关于日本本土宗教的最近几十年中取得了长足的进步,但关于神道教的邪恶概念却鲜有报道。考虑到神道教徒对生活的总体乐观态度,本文的目的是参照元永典永的思想分析其邪恶观,以查明神道教徒是否现实地理解它。另一个目的是将诺永永的立场与基督教奥古斯丁主义的观点进行比较,以确定哪一个对邪恶的挑战提供了更加连贯和全面的答案。论文考察了永永可用的著作和神道研究的最新学术著作,以及奥古斯丁和基督教学者关于邪恶的哲学问题的著作。人们发现,与逻辑上的不解之谜相比,诺里纳加的体系建立在逻辑上的矛盾基础上,无法理解邪恶挑战的深度。主要结论是,从永永和神道关于邪恶的概念及其消除方法的著作中出现的整体形象相当严峻:未能对永永的神道的邪恶起源或善性提供令人满意的解释在矛盾的卡米的影响下,以确定性的方式描绘了世界,同时也相信善与恶的最终胜利。毫无根据的神道保证与圣经的观点形成对照,在圣经中,全知,全能和善良的上帝提供了真正的希望。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ursulescu, Delia.;

  • 作者单位

    Liberty University.;

  • 授予单位 Liberty University.;
  • 学科 Religion General.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 69 p.
  • 总页数 69
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号