首页> 外文学位 >Development and Evaluation of 2D and 3D Image Quality Metrics.
【24h】

Development and Evaluation of 2D and 3D Image Quality Metrics.

机译:2D和3D图像质量指标的开发和评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With continuing advances in medical imaging technologies, there is an increased demand to extract quantitative information from images. This has been particularly vital in the effort to increase the efficacy and accuracy of diagnoses. Quantitative information is readily available in images because the acquisition techniques intrinsically involve physical processes. Quantitative image quality metrics are critical in the evaluation of medical images for diagnostic merit, particularly when used for the characterization and comparison of different systems. When such metrics are based on measurable physical parameters, they can provide valuable information for system optimization. Image quality describes the "goodness" of an image in displaying information for a task. This thesis explored methods of measuring image quality for two scenarios: (1) to characterize 2D flat-panel detector performance and (2) to measure directional spatial resolution for 3D images from breast tomosynthesis.;In the first chapter, two new wireless digital receptors (DRX-1C and DRX-1, Carestream Health, Inc., Rochester, NY) were evaluated and compared to a conventional flat-panel detector (Pixium 4600, Trixell, Moirans, France) on the basis of detective quantum efficiency (DQE). A secondary goal was also to evaluate the filtration to achieve specified beam qualities for the DQE measurements, closely following the methodology of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) for radiation qualities RQA5 and RQA9. All three DR systems demonstrated similar modulation transfer functions (MTFs) at most frequency ranges, while the DRX-1 showed lower values near the cutoff of approximately 3.5 cycles/mm. At each exposure, the Pixium 4600 and DRX-1C demonstrated similar noise power spectrum (NPS) curves that indicated better noise performance than the DRX-1. Zero-frequency DQEs for Pixium 4600, DRX-1C, and DRX-1 were approximately 63%, 74%, and 38% for RQA5 and 42%, 50%, and 28% for RQA9, respectively. In terms of DQE performance, the DRX-1C image receptor was found to be superior to the Pixium 4600 and DRX-1.;In the second chapter, the directional spatial resolution of simulated breast tomosynthesis images was determined using a cone-based technique and a sphere phantom. Projections were simulated for a voxelized breast phantom with 12 mm diameter sphere inserts using a fluence modeled from a 28 kVp beam incident upon an indirect flat-panel detector with 200 microm pixel size. Characteristic noise and blurring for each projection were added using cascaded systems analysis. The projections were reconstructed using a standard filtered backprojection technique, producing a 3D volume with an isotropic voxel size of 200 microm. Regions of interest (ROIs) that completely encompassed single spheres were extracted, and conical regions were prescribed along the three axes extending from the centroid. Voxels within a cone were used to form an edge spread function (ESF), from which the directional MTF was calculated. A bin size of 0.02 mm and a conical range of 30 degrees were found optimal for maximizing accuracy and minimizing noise of the MTF. A method for removing out-of-plane artifacts of the ESFs along in-plane axes was investigated and yielded a modified MTF. The idea of separating the effective resolution and artifacts from the measured ESF are expected to facilitate the interpretation of MTF measurements in breast tomosynthesis. Similar methods may be applied to characterize the spatial resolution of other 3D imaging modalities.
机译:随着医学成像技术的不断进步,对从图像中提取定量信息的需求不断增长。这对于提高诊断的效率和准确性至关重要。图像中容易获得定量信息,因为采集技术本质上涉及物理过程。图像质量定量指标对于评估医学图像的诊断价值至关重要,尤其是在用于表征和比较不同系统时。当此类度量基于可测量的物理参数时,它们可以为系统优化提供有价值的信息。图像质量描述了在显示任务信息时图像的“优劣”。本文探讨了两种情况下的图像质量测量方法:(1)表征2D平板探测器性能;(2)测量来自乳房断层合成的3D图像的方向空间分辨率。第一章,两种新型的无线数字接收器(DRX-1C和DRX-1,Carestream Health,Inc.,纽约州罗彻斯特)经过评估,并根据检测量子效率(DQE)与常规平板探测器(Pixium 4600,Trixell,Moirans,法国)进行了比较。第二个目标是,按照国际电工委员会(IEC)的辐射质量RQA5和RQA9的方法,评估过滤以达到DQE测量指定的光束质量。所有三个DR系统在大多数频率范围内都表现出相似的调制传递函数(MTF),而DRX-1在接近3.5个周期/ mm的截止点附近显示出较低的值。在每次曝光时,Pixium 4600和DRX-1C表现出相似的噪声功率谱(NPS)曲线,显示出比DRX-1更好的噪声性能。 Pixium 4600,DRX-1C和DRX-1的零频率DQE对于RQA5分别约为63%,74%和38%,对于RQA9分别为42%,50%和28%。在DQE性能方面,发现DRX-1C图像接收器优于Pixium 4600和DRX-1。在第二章中,使用基于圆锥的技术确定了模拟乳房断层合成图像的方向空间分辨率。球形幻影。使用从28 kVp光束入射到200微米像素大小的间接平板探测器上的注量模型,模拟了具有12毫米直径球体插入物的体素化乳房幻影的投影。使用级联系统分析添加了每个投影的特征噪声和模糊。使用标准的过滤反投影技术重建投影,产生3D体积,各向同性体素尺寸为200微米。提取完全涵盖单个球体的感兴趣区域(ROI),并沿从质心延伸的三个轴指定圆锥区域。视锥内的体素用于形成边缘扩展函数(ESF),据此可以计算方向MTF。已发现0.02毫米的料斗尺寸和30度的锥形范围对于最大化MTF的准确性和最小化噪声而言是最佳的。研究了一种沿着平面内轴去除ESF平面外伪影的方法,并得出了改进的MTF。将有效分辨率和伪像与测得的ESF分开的想法有望促进对乳房断层合成中MTF测量的解释。可以应用类似的方法来表征其他3D成像模态的空间分辨率。

著录项

  • 作者

    Murphy, Simon Nicholas.;

  • 作者单位

    Duke University.;

  • 授予单位 Duke University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Radiology.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 66 p.
  • 总页数 66
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号