首页> 外文学位 >Life cycle analysis of different pavement marking types for durable materials.
【24h】

Life cycle analysis of different pavement marking types for durable materials.

机译:耐用材料的不同路面标记类型的生命周期分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This particular research is focused on determining the life cycles of various pavement markings types, i.e. (Skip, Center, and Edges) of current durable pavement marking materials, i.e. inlaid tape and thermoplastic. The basic factors considered for this analysis were cumulative precipitation, cumulative snowfall, and cumulative traffic volume along with the retroreflectivity data collected by State highway Administration. This data was collected at six locations all over Maryland. The data was analyzed using a statistical software tool (SPSS) to conduct regression analysis and predict the life cycles. Four mathematical equations were used to determine the best model that would fit the overall data and define the relationship between these variables. These equations were used to generate the graphical outputs of the retroreflectivity performance. To give a better depiction, the overall output was represented in to nine different cases which were categorized based on the traffic and snow conditions i.e. (Low, Medium, and High). The R square value was used to ascertain the best model function. The linear function had the highest R square value among all the other equations, thus giving a best fit for the data collected and the variables used as input. Due to limited and inconsistent nature of the field data, some functions had lower R square values. The white skips and edges had a higher adjusted R square value than edges and centers for yellow markings. All types' skips, edges, and centers for thermoplastic and inlaid tape performed better under lower traffic and lighter snow conditions. Thermoplastic yellow center had very low R square values, and so did inlaid tape yellow center with shorter life cycles. Overall white skip had a longer life cycle than white edges for both materials, while yellow edges had a better life cycle than yellow center for both materials. Each marking type had a different life cycle resulting from one reaching the threshold value earlier than the other. The striping and installing of the marking types in two cases which are restriping all types with one or more types having a decent life cycle left, and restriping only one particular type marking which becomes ineffective, were found to be expensive in terms of the overall costs incurred. Thus this research tries to suggest suitable options so as to obtain uniform life cycles for all types so that they could be restriped and installed together, rather than one at a time after each type reaches its respective threshold value.
机译:这项特殊的研究着重于确定各种耐用标记材料(即镶嵌胶带和热塑性塑料)的各种路面标记类型(即(跳过,中心和边缘))的生命周期。此分析考虑的基本因素是累积降水,累积降雪和累积交通量以及国家公路管理局收集的回射率数据。该数据是在马里兰州的六个地点收集的。使用统计软件工具(SPSS)对数据进行分析,以进行回归分析并预测生命周期。使用四个数学方程式确定适合整个数据并定义这些变量之间关系的最佳模型。这些方程式用于生成回射性能的图形输出。为了更好地描述,将总输出表示为九种不同的情况,这些情况根据交通和降雪条件(低,中和高)进行了分类。 R平方值用于确定最佳模型函数。线性函数在所有其他方程式中具有最高的R平方值,因此最适合收集的数据和用作输入的变量。由于现场数据的有限性和不一致性,某些功能的R平方值较低。白色skip和边缘的调整R平方值高于黄色标记的边缘和中心。在较低的交通量和较轻的雪况下,用于热塑性塑料和镶嵌带的所有类型的s斗,边缘和中心都表现更好。热塑性黄色中心的R平方值非常低,镶嵌带黄色中心的寿命也更短。两种材料的总体白色跳跃比白色边缘具有更长的生命周期,而两种材料的黄色边缘具有比黄色中心更好的生命周期。每种标记类型都有不同的生命周期,这是因为一种标记比另一种标记更早达到阈值。发现在两种情况下剥离和安装标记类型是总成本高昂的两种情况,即重新撕裂所有类型,并留下一种或多种类型的生命周期,并且仅重新撕裂一种无效的特定类型标记,这是昂贵的引起的。因此,这项研究试图提出合适的选择,以使所有类型的生命周期保持一致,以便可以将它们重新撕裂并安装在一起,而不是每次每种类型达到其各自的阈值后一次安装。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jayanti, Sriram V.;

  • 作者单位

    Morgan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Morgan State University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.;Urban and Regional Planning.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 65 p.
  • 总页数 65
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号