首页> 外文学位 >Working smarter not harder: Using a pedagogical-based model in the rapid development of quality hybrid courses.
【24h】

Working smarter not harder: Using a pedagogical-based model in the rapid development of quality hybrid courses.

机译:更聪明,更努力地工作:在高质量混合课程的快速发展中使用基于教学法的模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This descriptive case study explored how repurposing and a pedagogical-based instructional design model, the multimodal model (Picciano, 2009), were used to create quality courses in a rapid development setting at a Midwestern land grant university. Data triangulation was used to secure data from faculty member interviews, course syllabi, and Desire to Learn (D2L) tours of the hybrid courses. From the research findings, the technique of repurposing did help faculty members develop hybrid courses in a rapid development setting. However, the multimodal model's (Picciano, 2009) implementation was less successful. Faculty members found this pedagogical-based model easy to use; but it was not used to its fullest potential. Overall, the hybrid courses developed in this research setting exhibited faculty-driven content. These faculty-driven courses led to implementation problems and therefore quality issues in the areas of course design, faculty development, and pedagogy.;A new instructional design model called the learner-driven learning (LDL) hybrid model was created to address the quality issues found in this case study. The LDL hybrid model consists of content, collaboration, and synthesis/evaluation. These three parts are connected to learner-driven learning experiences that are facilitated by faculty members. This hybrid instructional design model encourages faculty members to use constructivist, experiential, or problem-based learning theories. To work smarter not harder, higher education's faculty-driven pedagogical framework needs to be changed. Faculty-driven courses are more labor intensive and cost prohibitive, lead to higher revision costs, and cause a concern for equal learning opportunities for adult learners.
机译:该描述性案例研究探索了如何利用目的和基于教学法的教学设计模型(即多模式模型(Picciano,2009))在中西部土地赠予大学的快速发展环境中创建优质课程。数据三角剖分用于保护来自教师访谈,课程大纲和混合课程的“学习欲”(D2L)之旅的数据。从研究结果来看,重新定位的技术确实帮助教师在快速发展的环境中开发了混合课程。但是,多峰模型的实施(Picciano,2009)不太成功。教职员工发现这种基于教学法的模型易于使用。但是它并没有充分发挥其潜力。总体而言,在此研究环境中开发的混合课程展示了教师主导的内容。这些以教师为主导的课程导致课程设计,教师发展和教学法方面的实施问题和质量问题。;创建了一个新的教学设计模型,称为学习者驱动学习(LDL)混合模型以解决质量问题在此案例研究中发现。 LDL混合模型包括内容,协作和综合/评估。这三个部分与教师推动的学习者驱动的学习体验有关。这种混合式教学设计模型鼓励教师使用建构主义,经验式或基于问题的学习理论。为了更聪明,更勤奋地工作,需要改变高等教育的以教师为主导的教学框架。以教师为主导的课程需要更多的劳动强度和费用,增加修订成本,并引起成年学习者对平等学习机会的关注。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rust, Jodi E.;

  • 作者单位

    Capella University.;

  • 授予单位 Capella University.;
  • 学科 Education Instructional Design.;Education Curriculum and Instruction.;Education Technology of.;Education Pedagogy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 143 p.
  • 总页数 143
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号