首页> 外文学位 >Testimony on trial: Conrad, James and the contest for modernism (Joseph Conrad, Henry James).
【24h】

Testimony on trial: Conrad, James and the contest for modernism (Joseph Conrad, Henry James).

机译:审判证词:康拉德,詹姆斯和现代主义竞赛(约瑟夫·康拉德,亨利·詹姆斯)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the concept of testimony and how it has shaped both the modernist novel and our understanding of narrative in general. I argue that literary criticism has been governed by a peculiar epistemology that degrades the authority of personal testimony. Focusing especially on how it has affected our understanding of Joseph Conrad, whose fiction is often shaped by the testimonial narration of characters within the story, I trace this distorted conception of testimony through twentieth-century criticism all the way back to Henry James. I situate James's rejection of the "accurst autobiographic form" in the novel within a broader intellectual trend that instigated the "new journalism" of the late nineteenth century. Both the novel and the newspaper had been striving to assume a narrative posture that would transcend "mere testimony." Intellectual authorities then and now insist that the use of testimonial narration in fiction embodies "the relativism of modern philosophy," as one critic puts it. Remarkably, however, the various precepts of this relativism---that we cannot escape subjective perception, or that we cannot know historical reality---are never attributed to eighteenth-century epistolary novels, although these employ the same structures of "embedded" testimony that Conrad uses. Because eighteenth-century fiction is crucial to the development of testimonial narration in the novel, this study also examines how Conrad and James actively respond to this tradition, especially its "sentimental" strain. My analysis demonstrates that testimonial narration is indispensable to the major political task of the sentimental novel: to create and disseminate a publicly acceptable conception of privacy. After investigating works such as Conrad's Heart of Darkness, The Nigger of the "Narcissus", Lord Jim, as well as James's The Reverberator, The Portrait of a Lady and The American Scene, I close by examining Conrad's expose of the nineteenth century's most famous journalist-testifier, Henry Morton Stanley. I argue that Heart of Darkness reveals Stanley's abuse of the "witnessing" authority of the testifier and shows how his journalism helped European powers to devour central Africa.
机译:本文探讨了证词的概念,以及它如何塑造了现代主义小说以及我们对叙事的整体理解。我认为文学批评是由一种特殊的认识论所支配的,这种认识论使个人证言的权威性下降。我特别关注它如何影响我们对约瑟夫·康拉德(Joseph Conrad)的理解,约瑟夫·康拉德的小说通常是由故事中人物的证词叙述所塑造的,我通过二十世纪的批评一直追溯到亨利·詹姆斯,来追溯这种歪曲的证词概念。我将詹姆斯拒绝接受小说中的“准确的自传形式”,认为这是在更广泛的思想潮流中发起的,这激发了19世纪后期的“新新闻”。小说和报纸都在努力采取一种超越“纯粹的见证”的叙事姿态。一位批评家指出,当时和现在的权威人士都坚持认为,在小说中使用见证叙述体现了“现代哲学的相对主义”。然而,值得注意的是,这种相对论的各种戒律-我们不能逃避主观感知,或者我们不知道历史现实-从来没有归因于18世纪的书信小说,尽管这些小说采用了“嵌入”的相同结构。康拉德使用的证词。由于18世纪的小说对于小说叙事叙事的发展至关重要,因此本研究还考察了康拉德和詹姆斯如何积极应对这一传统,尤其是其“感性”派系。我的分析表明,感言小说对情感小说的主要政治任务是必不可少的:创建和传播公众可以接受的隐私概念。在调查了康拉德的《黑暗之心》,《水仙的黑鬼》,吉姆勋爵以及詹姆斯的《混响器》,《女士的画像》和《美国风光》等作品之后,我以康拉德对十九世纪最著名的作品的揭露进行了总结。记者见证人,亨利·莫顿·斯坦利。我认为,《黑暗之心》揭示了斯坦利对证人“证人”权威的滥用,并表明了他的新闻业如何帮助欧洲列强吞噬中非。

著录项

  • 作者

    Artese, Brian.;

  • 作者单位

    Northwestern University.;

  • 授予单位 Northwestern University.;
  • 学科 Literature Modern.; Literature English.; Literature American.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 283 p.
  • 总页数 283
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界文学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号