首页> 外文学位 >Unpacking utopia: Uncustomary inspections of the ideological baggage of exploration, empire, and otherness in selected English and American utopian fictions.
【24h】

Unpacking utopia: Uncustomary inspections of the ideological baggage of exploration, empire, and otherness in selected English and American utopian fictions.

机译:揭开乌托邦的面纱:对某些英美空想小说中的探索,帝国和其他意识形态包Un的惯常检查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study in literary utopia places critical focus on the travel narrative frame that conventional interpretation reads only as a simplistic formula for giving verisimilitude to the genre's discovery plots, credibility to its imaginary social alternatives, and vicarious estrangement to its readers, who are thereby invited to suspend disbelief so that they may instead evaluate whether political institutions and communal practices so depicted offer models for improving their society. Re-examination of canonical English and American utopian fictions published over the course of these nations' colonial and post-colonial relationships suggests that utopian travel's significance as utopian realism's transparent mediator has elided the ways it subjects utopian imagination to the ideological demands of empire-building. Utopianism's search for communal ideals and structures to rectify the disadvantages and displacements of oppressed groups not only develops within the interplay of imperialism, colonialism, and capitalism but also romanticizes the alienation, egression, and exploitation on which this triangulation of socio-political power depends; conventional literary utopia de-realizes both internal and external threats to nation and empire by defining disaffected travelers and foreign Others as resources indispensable to the eutopian perfection of hegemonic systems. Analyses of Utopia (1516), New Blazing World (1666), and Herland (1915) challenge familiar habits of reading to argue that these texts do not model ideal solutions for societal ills; they use parody of literary utopia's acquisitive foreign travels and eutopological idealism to resist and expose ideological pressures and discursive practices seen as enforcing politicized limits on utopianism's critical and creative energies. While these chapters demonstrate a need for continued reassessment of utopian fiction's role in reproducing, reshaping, or rejecting Anglophone imperialisms, from the early modern period to the present, the last tests twentieth-century feminist utopian fiction's claim to constitute a radical oppositional discourse. Analysis of the time and multidimensional travel plots in Woman on the Edge of Time (1976) and The Female Man (1975) and comparative inquiry into the Xenogenesis trilogy (1987--89) and Bearheart: The Heirship Chronicles (1990) lead this study to conclude that utopia remains an ambiguous promise of oppression and liberation.
机译:这项针对文学乌托邦的研究将重点放在旅行叙事框架上,传统解释仅将其作为简化模型的形式使用,以使该类型的发现情节具有真实性,其假想的社会替代品的信誉以及对读者的替代性替代,因此邀请读者阅读暂停怀疑,以便他们反而可以评估如此描绘的政治制度和社区实践是否提供了改善其社会的模式。在这些国家的殖民和后殖民关系过程中对英国和美国的理想乌托邦小说进行的重新审查表明,乌托邦旅行作为乌托邦现实主义的透明调解人的重要性消除了它使乌托邦想象力服从于帝国建设的意识形态要求的方式。乌托邦主义寻求公共理想和结构以纠正被压迫者的劣势和流离失所不仅在帝国主义,殖民主义和资本主义的相互作用中发展,而且使社会政治权力三角化所依赖的异化,外出和剥削浪漫化;传统的文学乌托邦通过将不满的旅行者和外国其他人定义为霸权体系的乌托邦式完善所不可或缺的资源,从而消除了对国家和帝国的内部和外部威胁。对乌托邦(1516年),新炽热世界(1666年)和赫兰德(1915年)的分析挑战了人们熟悉的阅读习惯,认为这些文本并未为社会疾病提供理想的解决方案。他们利用模仿乌托邦的外来旅行和安乐死的唯心主义来模仿和抵抗意识形态的压力和话语实践,这被视为对乌托邦主义的批判和创造力进行了政治化的限制。尽管这些章节表明有必要继续重新评估乌托邦小说在再现,重塑或拒绝英语帝国主义中的作用,但从近代早期到现在,最后的考验是20世纪女性主义乌托邦小说声称构成激进的对立话语。分析《时间边缘的女人》(1976)和《女性男人》(1975)中的时间和多维旅行情节,并对Xenogenesis三部曲(1987--89)和《熊心:继承史》(1990)进行比较研究,进行了这项研究得出结论,乌托邦仍然是压迫和解放的含糊承诺。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nelson, Jennifer Schwenk.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Riverside.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Riverside.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.; Literature English.; Literature American.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 553 p.
  • 总页数 553
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 文学理论;
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号