首页> 外文学位 >Constituting governable subjects: Foucault and governmentality's account of 'governing through freedom' and the case of the Indigenous populations of Canada.
【24h】

Constituting governable subjects: Foucault and governmentality's account of 'governing through freedom' and the case of the Indigenous populations of Canada.

机译:构成可支配的主体:福柯和政府机构对“通过自由治理”的论述以及加拿大土著居民的案例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In 1978, Michel Foucault introduced his genealogy of the modern state, or alternatively, what he termed governmentality in which politics is understood as the product of rationalities which make up rule. Foucault's problematic was to uncover the rationalities of bio-power or bio-politics which is situated within liberal rule. For Foucault, liberalism is to be viewed as a philosophy of rule that concerned itself with the rationality that the state may be governing too heavily and which increasingly divested itself of its regulatory capacities and consequently sought to guide the conduct of the population through often indirect and distanced means. Subsequently, others have built upon Foucault's work on liberalism and have concluded that the phrase governing through freedom adequately characterizes liberal philosophies of rule. However, numerous critiques have been raised concerning the contention that liberalism brought with it a substantiated increase in freedom. It is this critique that the current research wishes to expand upon by using the case of the Aboriginal peoples throughout Canada between the eighteenth and nineteenth century to display that the concept of governing through freedom is far too restricted and that the governmentality literature often presents an incomplete account of classical liberalism.
机译:1978年,米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)介绍了他关于现代国家的家谱,或者他所谓的政府性,在这种政府中,政治被理解为构成规则的理性的产物。福柯的问题是要发现自由主义统治下的生物力量或生物政治的合理性。对于福柯而言,自由主义应被视为一种法治哲学,它关注国家可能过于执政的合理性,并日益剥夺其监管能力,因此试图通过通常是间接和间接的方式来指导民众的行为。距离均值。随后,其他人以福柯关于自由主义的工作为基础,并得出结论,通过自由进行统治这一短语充分体现了自由主义的统治哲学。但是,对于自由主义带来的实质性自由增加的论点,已经提出了许多批评。正是这种批评使得当前的研究希望通过利用18世纪至19世纪加拿大全国各地土著人民的案例来加以扩展,以表明通过自由治理的概念过于局限,而政府性文献常常提出了不完整的观点。古典自由主义的说明。

著录项

  • 作者

    Budreau, Marley N.;

  • 作者单位

    Queen's University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Queen's University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Sociology Theory and Methods.;Native American Studies.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 96 p.
  • 总页数 96
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号