首页> 外文学位 >The working self and the subject of freedom: Michel Foucault's analytics of liberalism and the work ethic as a technique of liberal governmentality .
【24h】

The working self and the subject of freedom: Michel Foucault's analytics of liberalism and the work ethic as a technique of liberal governmentality .

机译:工作的自我和自由的主体:米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)对自由主义和作为自由主义政府性技术的职业道德的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation I explore how the work ethic plays an important role in the government of modern life, specifically, how we use it to govern ourselves and govern others. First, I consider how Foucault's concept of government as "conduct of conduct" can be useful in coming to terms with the ways in which liberalism (as an art of government that is always suspicious of governing too much) governs, even in those spaces usually considered "free from" government. Using Foucault's notion of government, and the related notion of governmentality reveals ways that we are governed "beyond the state," i.e., through various techniques of the self and techniques of domination.Second, this dissertation provides an overview of Foucault's "critical ontology" of liberalism Foucault's work on disciplinary power and bio-politics, I argue, provides a useful critique that reveals how the space of freedom is actually constituted by specific political practices and how the production of this space assumes a specific kind of liberal subject, which is the product of disciplinary and bio-political regimes. Assessing Foucault's body of work though this "governmentality" lens reveals a more continuous line of thought concerned not only with power and subjectivity, but also government.Finally, I use this Foucault inspired approach to political theory to examine how the work ethic operates as a technique of liberal government in the contemporary United States. Specifically, I focus on how the work ethic has informed psychiatric definitions of normality and how our assumptions about normal subjectivity have led to an individualization of the causes of poverty and unemployment, further marginalizing the poor and unemployed. Ultimately we must rethink the nature of freedom with the knowledge that we are never truly "free from" government. By engaging in what Foucault calls a critical ontology of our limits, we might begin to grasp how things as seemingly benign as the work ethic govern us in specific ways and how we use them to force others to govern themselves accordingly.
机译:在这篇论文中,我探讨了职业道德在现代政府中如何发挥重要作用,特别是,我们如何用它来统治自己和统治他人。首先,我认为福柯关于“行为举止”的政府概念如何有助于理解自由主义(作为一种总是怀疑执政过多的政府艺术)的执政方式,即使在通常情况下也是如此。被认为是“免于”政府。使用福柯的政府概念和相关的政府性概念,我们可以通过各种自我技术和统治技术来揭示我们“超越国家”的治理方式。其次,本文概述了福柯的“批判本体论”。我认为,福柯关于纪律权力和生物政治的工作提出了一个有用的批判,揭示了自由空间实际上是由特定的政治实践构成的,并且该空间的产生如何假设特定的自由主义主题,这是纪律和生物政治制度的产物。通过这种“政府性”的视角来评估福柯的工作体系,揭示了一条不仅与权力和主观性有关,而且与政府有关的更连续的思路。最后,我使用这种由福柯启发的政治理论方法来考察工作伦理如何作为一种政治行为进行运作。当代美国的自由政府技术。具体而言,我关注的是职业道德如何为正常人的精神病学定义提供依据,以及我们对正常主观性的假设如何导致贫困和失业原因的个体化,进而使穷人和失业者边缘化。最终,我们必须以我们永远不会真正“摆脱”政府的知识重新思考自由的本质。通过参与福柯所谓的极限本体论,我们可能会开始理解看似良善的事物如何以特定的职业道德统治我们,以及我们如何利用它们迫使他人相应地统治自己。

著录项

  • 作者

    Davis, George V.;

  • 作者单位

    The Pennsylvania State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Pennsylvania State University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 210 p.
  • 总页数 210
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号