首页> 外文学位 >Party, peasants and power in a Russian district: The winning of peasant support for collectivization in Sychevka raion, 1928--1931.
【24h】

Party, peasants and power in a Russian district: The winning of peasant support for collectivization in Sychevka raion, 1928--1931.

机译:俄罗斯地区的政党,农民和政权:1928--1931年在Sychevka raion赢得了农民对集体化的支持。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation argues that collectivization was accomplished in Sychevka raion, Smolensk guberniia/Western oblast , USSR, mainly through employing a variety of techniques which attracted peasants to voluntarily join collective farms. Contrary to widely held expectations, most peasants did not prosper after the 1917 Revolutions. Although peasants increased their landholdings from expropriated noble land, peasant productivity remained low because the poverty of peasants prevented efficiency gains. About two-thirds of peasants in Sychevka were "middle peasants," but their average incomes were very close to those of "poor peasants." Peasant dissatisfaction on this account was reinforced by a conviction on the part of many peasants that the new communist administrators in the countryside had formed an alliance ("smychka") with well-to-do peasants and favored their interests over those of the less wealthy. Such dissatisfaction created the possibility that many peasants were open to supporting Party initiatives to reorganize rural life.; At first the Party put forth a "class line" policy, favoring poorer peasants. However, the well-to-do peasants who composed the leaderships of the rural institutions, such as village skhody, sel'sovety and rural cooperatives, largely sabotaged this initiative. Rural Party cadres often supported these actions. To overcome this, the Party leadership turned to a "class empowerment" policy in which they encouraged poor peasants (bednoty) in the various rural institutions to form "bednot groups," which were then assigned oversight roles in these institutions. As these roles politicized poor peasants and taught them the skills of management and political organizing, bednoty emerged as a political force in the countryside capable of attracting middle peasants to collectivization. Along with purges and new recruitment practices, the changed political practices required of local cadres in order to create bednot groups helped reorganize the rural Party as collectivization proceeded.
机译:本文认为,集体化是在苏联的斯摩棱斯克州/西俄州的锡切夫卡地区完成的,主要是通过采用各种吸引农民自愿加入集体农场的技术。与人们普遍期望的相反,大多数农民在1917年革命之后没有繁荣。尽管农民从被征用的高贵土地上增加了土地所有权,但农民的生产率仍然很低,因为农民的贫穷阻碍了效率的提高。锡切夫卡大约有三分之二的农民是“中农”,但他们的平均收入却非常接近“贫困农民”。许多农民坚信,新的农村行政管理者与富裕的农民结成了联盟(“ smychka”),农民对此表示不满,这使他们更加不满。 。这种不满造成了许多农民愿意支持党的改组农村生活的倡议的可能性。起初,党提出了“阶级路线”政策,扶持贫困农民。但是,组成乡村机构领导人的富裕农民,如乡村学校,自民党和农村合作社,在很大程度上破坏了这一倡议。农村党的干部经常支持这些行动。为了克服这个问题,党的领导层转向了“阶级赋权”政策,在该政策中,他们鼓励各种农村机构中的贫困农民(床民)成立“床民团体”,然后在这些机构中指派监督角色。当这些角色使贫穷的农民政治化并教会他们管理和政治组织技能时,便笺成为了农村中能够吸引中农集体化的政治力量。随着清除和新的征聘做法,地方干部为建立床尾小团体而需要改变的政治做法,随着集体化进程的进行,帮助了农村党的重组。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hier, Charles Bailey.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pittsburgh.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pittsburgh.;
  • 学科 History European.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 532 p.
  • 总页数 532
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 欧洲史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号