首页> 外文学位 >Bond strength evaluation of ceramic and stainless steel bracket bases subjected to cyclic tensile stress.
【24h】

Bond strength evaluation of ceramic and stainless steel bracket bases subjected to cyclic tensile stress.

机译:陶瓷和不锈钢托架基座承受循环拉伸应力的粘结强度评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives. The current project evaluated the affects of fatigue (cyclic loading) on the bond strength of currently available ceramic bracket bases compared to a stainless steel foil mesh base. Fatigue testing is done to assess the influence of repetitive occlusal forces on dental materials.; Materials and methods. 160 permanent lower bovine incisors were obtained. Three ceramics (3M/Unitek ClarityRTM, RMO Signature IIIRTM, GAC MystiqueRTM) and one stainless steel bracket (3M/Unitek VictoryRTM) were used and divided into 2 groups (Static and Cyclic) each with four subgroups for the different bracket types. Mean tensile bond strengths were measured using a Instron 1125RTM Testing Machine and statistically compared for significant differences between all groups.; Results. The ClarityRTM, Mystique RTM, and VictoryRTM bracket bases showed a significant reduction in mean tensile bond strength due to cyclic loading. The Signature IIIRTM bracket base showed no significant difference. The MystiqueRTM bracket base had the highest bond strength in both static and cyclic testing near 11 MPa and 9 MPa respectively. The Clarity RTM bracket base had the lowest bond strength under cyclic loading around 2 MPa.; Conclusion. Bracket base designs have a significant impact on bracket performance under fatiguing conditions. Cyclic loading causes a significant reduction in mean tensile bond strength, thus fatigue testing is more reflective of realistic clinical performance.
机译:目标。当前项目评估了疲劳(循环载荷)对与不锈钢箔网状基体相比目前可用的陶瓷托基的粘结强度的影响。进行疲劳测试以评估重复咬合力对牙科材料的影响。材料和方法。获得160个永久性下牛切牙。使用了三种陶瓷(3M / Unitek ClarityRTM,RMO Signature IIIRTM,GAC MystiqueRTM)和一个不锈钢支架(3M / Unitek VictoryRTM),并分为两组(静态和循环),每种具有四个亚组,分别用于不同的支架类型。使用Instron 1125RTM测试机测量平均抗拉强度,并统计比较所有组之间的显着差异。结果。 ClarityRTM,Mystique RTM和VictoryRTM托架底座由于循环载荷而导致平均抗拉强度明显降低。 Signature IIIRTM支架底座没有显着差异。 MystiqueRTM托架底座在静态和循环测试中分别具有最高的粘结强度,分别接近11 MPa和9 MPa。 Clarity RTM托架底座在2 MPa左右的循环载荷下的结合强度最低。结论。在疲劳条件下,支架底座设计对支架性能具有重大影响。循环载荷会显着降低平均抗拉强度,因此疲劳测试更能反映实际的临床表现。

著录项

  • 作者

    Soderquist, Scott Albert.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Chicago.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Dentistry.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 69 p.
  • 总页数 69
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 口腔科学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:44:06

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号