首页> 外文学位 >An evaluation of state-and-transition model development for ecological sites in northern Utah.
【24h】

An evaluation of state-and-transition model development for ecological sites in northern Utah.

机译:犹他州北部生态区状态转换模型开发的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Ecological sites and state-transition models (STMs) have become the preferred means of summarizing plant community dynamics on distinctive types of rangeland. Ecological sites classify rangeland types based on soil-geomorphic and climatic conditions capable of producing a known plant community, while a STM depicts the vegetation dynamics of an ecological site. STMs are usually based on expert opinion rather than site-specific data; however, if they are to gain credibility, STMs must accurately describe the processes that drive plant community dynamics. This study examined three ways of developing process-based STMs using three levels of commonly collected field data. We began by taking field inventories of three ecological sites already mapped in northwestern Utah: Loamy Bottom, Mountain Gravelly Loam, and Upland Loam. The Loamy Bottom site was ideal for developing a data-rich, process-based STM because 1) the site concepts were well-defined, 2) the site was easy to recognize, 3) potential states and transitions had already been hypothesized, and 4) the site was easily accessible. The Loamy Bottom study was designed to link plant community structural indicators to measurable indicators of ecological process. Principal components analysis and cluster analysis were used to classify 14 study plots into four distinct states. Simple linear regression showed relationships between perennial grass cover, perennial canopy gaps, and soil organic carbon. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) linked four general vegetation classes to soil stability measurements. The resulting STM describes the structure and function of four alternative states. The other two STMs, developed for the Mountain Gravelly Loam and Upland Loam ecological sites, used less-intensive data collection methods. Rangeland health assessments, used for the Upland Loam STM, are useful for refining initial ecological site and STM concepts, documenting states, hypothesizing transitions, and locating study locations for future research. Quantitative production and cover estimates, used for the Mountain Gravelly Loam STM, are useful for describing the structure of states, but structural indicators must be coupled with process measurements, as with the Loamy Bottom STM to understand the drivers of state change. A coordinated data collection effort is needed to produce STMs that accurately depict the plant community dynamics of ecological sites.
机译:生态场所和状态转换模型(STM)已成为总结独特草地类型植物群落动态的首选手段。生态站点根据能够产生已知植物群落的土壤地貌和气候条件对牧场类型进行分类,而STM则描述了生态站点的植被动态。 STM通常基于专家意见,而不是特定于站点的数据。但是,如果要获得信誉,STM必须准确描述驱动植物群落动态的过程。这项研究检查了使用三个级别的通常收集的现场数据开发基于过程的STM的三种方法。首先,我们从犹他州西北部已经绘制的三个生态站点的实地调查开始:坡底,壤土壤土和高地壤土。 Loamy Bottom站点非常适合开发基于数据的,基于过程的STM,因为1)站点概念定义明确,2)站点易于识别,3)潜在状态和转换已被假定,以及4 ),该网站很容易访问。壤质底部研究旨在将植物群落结构指标与生态过程的可衡量指标联系起来。使用主成分分析和聚类分析将14个研究样地分为四个不同的状态。简单线性回归显示多年生草覆盖率,多年生冠层间隙和土壤有机碳之间的关系。方差分析(ANOVA)将四种常规植被类别与土壤稳定性测量联系在一起。生成的STM描述了四个替代状态的结构和功能。为Mountain Gravelly Loam和Upland Loam生态站点开发的其他两个STM使用了强度较低的数据收集方法。用于高地壤土STM的牧场健康评估对完善初始生态位点和STM概念,记录状态,假设过渡以及确定研究位置以供将来研究很有用。用于Mountain Gravelly Loam STM的定量生产和覆盖估计值对于描述状态结构很有用,但是结构指标必须与过程测量相结合,例如Loamy Bottom STM才能了解状态变化的驱动力。需要进行协调的数据收集工作,以产生能够准确描述生态场所植物群落动态的STM。

著录项

  • 作者

    Johanson, Jamin K.;

  • 作者单位

    Utah State University.;

  • 授予单位 Utah State University.;
  • 学科 Environmental Sciences.;Agriculture Range Management.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 174 p.
  • 总页数 174
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号