首页> 外文学位 >Academic achievement differences between Title I students enrolled in music classes and Title I students who are not.
【24h】

Academic achievement differences between Title I students enrolled in music classes and Title I students who are not.

机译:参加音乐课的第一名学生与未参加音乐课的第一名学生的学业成绩差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose. The purpose of the study was to determine academic achievement differences between those Title I students enrolled in music classes and Title I students who are not enrolled in music classes. A second purpose was to determine educators' perceptions regarding the educational justice implications of excluding nonproficient Title I students from music.;Methodology. This was a mixed-methods study using quantitative data from the annual state achievement test and quantitative data utilizing a 7-point Likert scale measuring perceptions of teachers and administrators regarding the issue of removing nonproficient Title I students from music programs. Additionally, qualitative data were collected from an open-ended question at the end of the survey. The methodology used for the quantitative and qualitative data enabled the researcher to conduct a statistical analysis that directly addressed the research questions.;Findings. Data analysis revealed that overall, Title I student participating in music enjoy a dramatically higher proficiency rate on the California Standards Test (CST) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) than Title I students not participating in music. Additional data demonstrate that teachers and administrators agree that the study of music is important, music "connects" student with school, nonproficient Title I students who are struggling in mathematics should not be pulled from music for supplemental instruction in mathematics, and nonproficient Title I students who are struggling in English should not be pulled from music for supplemental instruction in English. Teachers and administrators, however, disagreed that the involuntary exclusion of nonproficient students denies them their right of equal access. Qualitative themes that emerged were dropout, opportunity, intervention, self-worth, and accountability.;Recommendation. The recommendation for further research is that it should focus on replicating this study in other Title I areas with music programs.
机译:目的。这项研究的目的是确定在音乐课上报名的I类学生与未在音乐课上报名的I类学生之间的学业成绩差异。第二个目的是确定教育者对于将不熟练的Title I学生从音乐中排除的教育正义影响的看法。这是一项混合方法研究,使用了年度状态成就测试的定量数据和使用7点李克特量表的定量数据,该量表测量了教师和管理人员对从音乐节目中剔除不称职的I类学生的看法。此外,在调查结束时从一个开放性问题中收集了定性数据。用于定量和定性数据的方法使研究人员能够进行统计分析,从而直接解决研究问题。数据分析显示,总体而言,参加音乐的第一名学生在加利福尼亚标准考试(CST)和加利福尼亚高中毕业考试(CAHSEE)上的熟练程度要比未参加音乐的第一名学生高得多。其他数据表明,教师和管理人员同意音乐的学习很重要,音乐将学生与学校联系起来,在数学方面苦苦挣扎的I类不精通的学生不应从音乐中脱颖而出,以进行数学辅助教学,以及I类不精通的学生那些在英语方面苦苦挣扎的人,不应从音乐中脱颖而出,以英语进行补充指导。但是,教师和管理人员不同意,非熟练学生的非自愿排斥会剥夺他们平等获得教育的权利。出现的定性主题是辍学,机会,干预,自我价值和责任感。进行进一步研究的建议是,应将其研究重点放在具有音乐程序的其他Title I领域中。

著录项

  • 作者

    McDaniel, Brian.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Redlands.;

  • 授予单位 University of Redlands.;
  • 学科 Education Tests and Measurements.;Education Policy.;Education School Administration.;Education Music.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 85 p.
  • 总页数 85
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号