首页> 外文学位 >A historical analysis of Property Reform Act of 2006.
【24h】

A historical analysis of Property Reform Act of 2006.

机译:对《 2006年财产改革法案》的历史分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The South Carolina Property Tax Reform Bill was signed into law in June 2006 creating a new way of generating money for public education in South Carolina. The Property Tax Reform Act eliminated 100% of the fair market value of 4% owner-occupied property for the purposes of taxation for school operations. Additionally, the Act increased the sales tax by 1% on most goods. Further, the Act limited a local school district's ability to raise additional revenue.;The following qualitative study used historical research design with an emphasis on oral history. The researcher used the wealth neutrality theory for the theoretical basis. The purpose of this study was to describe the 2006 political climate that changed sources of revenue for public education. The study focused on the following overarching question: What were the political influences on the South Carolina General Assembly's 2006 enactment of Act 388, South Carolina Property Tax Reform Bill?;Among the responses to interviews, sixteen participants described their views of the importance and meaning of Act 388 in terms of taxpayer burden or alternately in terms of effects on public schools. The participants were selected from public officials including former and current members of the South Carolina General Assembly, grassroots taxpayer groups along with business and real estate representatives, media and other public policy observers and analysts. During the 2010 session of the South Carolina Legislature, the study participants responded to a structured interview protocol with three sets of questions and associated follow-up probes.;After a process of field notes and taking memos, the participants' points of view offered insights into six categories of responses associated with the purpose of this study. The six categories included the following: (a) equity for taxpayers, (b) shift in tax burden, (c) adequacy of resources, (d) Act 388 effects on education in South Carolina, (e) local control of schools, and (f) possible changes to Act 388. The practical implications of this study include encouraging policy makers to enact comprehensive tax reform in South Carolina. The ongoing effects of the global recession argue for further research on revenue generation for public schooling.
机译:《南卡罗来纳州财产税改革法案》于2006年6月签署成为法律,为南卡罗来纳州的公共教育创造了一种新的创收方式。 《财产税改革法案》取消了4%业主自有财产的公平市场价值的100%,用于学校运营的税收。此外,该法案将大多数商品的营业税提高了1%。此外,该法案还限制了当地学区增加额外收入的能力。以下定性研究使用了历史研究设计,并着重口述历史。研究人员使用财富中立理论作为理论基础。这项研究的目的是描述2006年的政治气候,它改变了公共教育的收入来源。该研究集中在以下总体问题上:对南卡罗来纳州大会2006年颁布的《南卡罗来纳州财产税改革法案》第388号法案产生了哪些政治影响?在接受采访时,有十六名参与者描述了他们的重要性和意义。根据第388号法案的规定,从纳税人负担或对公立学校的影响角度而言。与会者选自公共官员,包括南卡罗来纳州大会的前任和现任成员,基层纳税人团体以及商业和房地产代表,媒体以及其他公共政策观察员和分析师。在2010年南卡罗莱纳州议会会议期间,研究参与者对结构化的访谈规程进行了回答,涉及三组问题和相关的后续探查。经过实地记录和备忘后,参与者的观点提供了见解。分为与本研究目的相关的六类响应。六个类别包括:(a)纳税人的平等,(b)税收负担的​​转移,(c)资源充足,(d)第388号法令对南卡罗来纳州的教育产生影响,(e)对学校的地方控制,以及(f)可能修改第388号法案。这项研究的实际意义包括鼓励政策制定者在南卡罗来纳州实施全面的税收改革。全球衰退的持续影响要求对公立学校创收的进一步研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pitts, David Arthur.;

  • 作者单位

    Clemson University.;

  • 授予单位 Clemson University.;
  • 学科 Education Finance.;Education Leadership.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 119 p.
  • 总页数 119
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号