首页> 外文学位 >An empirical investigation of the relevance and predictive ability of the SAS 99 fraud risk factors.
【24h】

An empirical investigation of the relevance and predictive ability of the SAS 99 fraud risk factors.

机译:SAS 99欺诈风险因素的相关性和预测能力的实证研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Scope and methodology. This study empirically examined the fraud risk factors adopted by the Accounting Standards Board in SAS No. 99 and developed a fraud prediction model that is useful in discriminating between fraud and no-fraud firms. The first phase of testing involved identifying and testing proxies for Cressey's fraud triangle (pressure, opportunity, and rationalization). A step-wise logistic regression analysis of matched sample firms was used to evaluate the usefulness of the fraud risk factors in discriminating between fraud and no-fraud firms. Notably, all data was collected from publicly available sources.; Findings and conclusion. After identifying the significant fraud risk factors, the study applied multiple discriminate analysis to the significant variables to develop a fraud prediction model. The results indicate that users of publicly available data should take additional precautions when companies have audit committees with a low percentage of outside directors, high management ownership exceeding 5 percent, high cumulative percentage ownership in the firm held by insiders, and/or a CEO who holds both the CEO and Chairman of the Board position.; The prediction model correctly classified fraud firms 72 percent of the time. This finding is important since Kuruppu et al. (2003) noted that the Altman bankruptcy model, when applied to matched samples such as this study, only has an accuracy rate of between 40 and 50 percent. Additionally, studies that have expanded the financial ratios used by Altman (1969), such as Persons (1995) and Kaminski et al. (2004), have correctly identified fraud firms in the year prior to the fraud only 20 to 40 percent of the time. The fraud prediction model developed in this study is more accurate in correctly identifying no-fraud firms. The overall effect is that this fraud prediction model has a lower misclassification error of fraud and no-fraud firms than the other models.
机译:范围和方法。这项研究以实证方法检查了会计准则委员会在第99号SAS中采用的欺诈风险因素,并开发了一种欺诈预测模型,该模型可用于区分欺诈和无欺诈公司。测试的第一阶段涉及识别和测试Cressey欺诈三角的代理(压力,机会和合理化)。使用匹配样本公司的逐步逻辑回归分析来评估欺诈风险因素在区分欺诈公司和非欺诈公司中的有用性。值得注意的是,所有数据都是从公开来源收集的。结论和结论。在确定了重大欺诈风险因素之后,该研究对重大变量进行了多种判别分析,以开发欺诈预测模型。结果表明,当公司的审计委员会的外部董事比例低,管理层的所有权超过5%的比例高,内部人员持有的公司的累积所有权比例高和/或首席执行官(包括首席执行官)时,公开可用数据的用户应采取额外的预防措施。兼任首席执行官兼董事长。预测模型在72%的时间内对欺诈公司进行了正确分类。自Kuruppu等人以来,这一发现很重要。 (2003)指出,将Altman破产模型应用于本研究之类的匹配样本时,其准确率仅为40%至50%。此外,扩大了Altman(1969)使用的财务比率的研究,例如Persons(1995)和Kaminski等。 (2004年),在欺诈发生的前一年中,仅20%到40%的时间正确识别了欺诈公司。本研究中开发的欺诈预测模型在正确识别无欺诈公司方面更为准确。总体效果是,该欺诈预测模型比其他模型具有更低的欺诈和无欺诈公司误分类错误。

著录项

  • 作者

    Skousen, Christopher J.;

  • 作者单位

    Oklahoma State University.;

  • 授予单位 Oklahoma State University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Accounting.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 101 p.
  • 总页数 101
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 财务管理、经济核算;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号