首页> 外文学位 >Cost-effectiveness of instructional delivery platforms: Comparing classroom, satellite, and online education (Mexico).
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of instructional delivery platforms: Comparing classroom, satellite, and online education (Mexico).

机译:教学平台的成本效益:比较教室,卫星和在线教育(墨西哥)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study compares three different approaches for providing a graduate-level business curriculum: classroom-based "face to face", "satellite"-based video, and computer-based "online," as they are practiced by a single institution, the Instituto Technologica y de Estudios Superiores (ITESM). The primary question addressed by the dissertation is: Which delivery mode is most cost-effective for instruction at ITESM, given its particular students, curriculum, and faculty? Cost-effectiveness is defined as the relationship of costs per student to final course grade, measured from 0--100. The cost analysis reported appears more reliable than the effectiveness analysis because of weaknesses of the effectiveness analysis described in the text. Classroom education would appear to both costs less and be more effective than distance education alternatives at low and medium enrollments. Enrollments greater than 200 would have to be realized in order to have any consequential difference in cost-effectiveness in favor of the distance education alternatives. This "break-even" point can change radically with different assumptions. Cost models were developed in this study to estimate and analyze direct institutional costs associated with providing instruction. At Monterrey, classroom courses were found to be less expensive on a total and per student basis until enrollments of 150. At enrollments greater than 150, online education becomes the least costly of the three alternatives. The effectivness analysis suggests that the satellite and online platforms were consistently associated with small declines in performance relative to classroom-based education at Monterrey. These differences were not always statistically significant. Even when statistically significant, the actual point-size difference was of small practical consequence---usually just one point on a scale of 1--100. The study concludes with a summary of the dissertation and reflections regarding its implications.
机译:这项研究比较了三种提供研究生级商业课程的方法:基于教室的“面对面”,基于“卫星”的视频和基于计算机的“在线”,这是由一家机构Instituto实施的。卓越技术工作室(ITESM)。论文所要解决的主要问题是:鉴于特定的学生,课程和教职员工,哪种授课方式对ITESM的授课最具成本效益?成本效益是指每个学生的成本与最终课程成绩的关系,范围为0--100。由于本文中描述的有效性分析的弱点,所报告的成本分析似乎比有效性分析更可靠。与中低入学率的远程教育相比,课堂教育似乎更便宜,更有效。为了实现成本效益方面的任何显着差异,而采用远程教育替代方案,必须实现200多人的入学率。在不同的假设下,这一“收支平衡”点可能会发生根本性的变化。在这项研究中开发了成本模型,以估计和分析与提供指导相关的直接机构成本。在蒙特雷,发现在总人数和每名学生基础上,课堂课程的费用要便宜一些,直到招收150名学生为止。注册人数超过150名时,在线教育成为这三种方法中成本最低的。有效性分析表明,相对于蒙特雷的课堂教学,卫星和在线平台始终与绩效的小幅下降相关。这些差异并不总是统计上显着的。即使具有统计学意义,实际的点数大小差异也不会产生实际的结果-通常在1--100的范围内只有一个点。本研究以论文的总结和对本文含义的思考作为总结。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bakia, Marianne F.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Education Technology.; Education Higher.; Education Business.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 137 p.
  • 总页数 137
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 高等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号