首页> 外文学位 >A Global Perspective of Private Labels Success: The Function of Manufacturer Power, Retailer Strategy and Consumer Conduct.
【24h】

A Global Perspective of Private Labels Success: The Function of Manufacturer Power, Retailer Strategy and Consumer Conduct.

机译:私人商标成功的全球视角:制造商权力,零售商战略和消费者行为的功能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Private label growth in emerging markets has not kept pace with the growth in private labels elsewhere. For instance, in Europe and North America, private labels now constitute an average of 35% of total retail market share, compared to emerging markets, where market shares vary between 1% and 8 %. This dissertation examines the possibility that differences in private-label performance between developed and emerging economies is not driven by one mechanism, but arises from a variety of sources, both structural, and behavioral. Specifically, I focus on manufacturers' market power, retailers' private label portfolio strategies, and consumers' perceptions of private labels. In most emerging economies, national brand manufacturers tend to be the sole producers of private labels. As a result, manufacturers have inherent market power and can deter retailers from pursuing aggressive private label strategies, which results in low private label market shares. Moreover, some retailers in emerging economies now carry their private labels as part of a multi-tiered portfolio. However, a small price-gap between the quality tiers results in high intraportfolio competition leading to cannibalization and lower private label market shares. Last, private label market shares in emerging economies may be smaller than in developed economies because low-income households prefer higher priced national brands. This counterintuitive phenomenon is driven by two interrelated factors. First, social influence implies that low-income households are upward-comparing, they contrast themselves with high-income households whom they believe are better-off. Because higher-income households purchase national brands, upward-comparisons lead to a preference for national brands. Second, low income households are unknowledgeable about private label advancements hence they prefer national brands.
机译:新兴市场中自有品牌的增长没有跟上其他地方自有品牌的增长。例如,在欧洲和北美,自有品牌现在平均占总零售市场份额的35%,而新兴市场的份额在1%至8%之间。本文研究了发达经济体和新兴经济体之间自有品牌绩效差异不是由一种机制驱动,而是由结构和行为的多种来源引起的可能性。具体来说,我专注于制造商的市场力量,零售商的自有品牌投资组合策略以及消费者对自有品牌的看法。在大多数新兴经济体中,民族品牌制造商往往是自有品牌的唯一生产商。结果,制造商具有固有的市场力量,可以阻止零售商采取积极的自有品牌策略,这导致自有品牌市场份额较低。而且,新兴经济体中的一些零售商现在将自己的自有品牌作为多层投资组合的一部分。但是,质量等级之间的价格差距很小,导致投资组合内的激烈竞争,导致自相残杀并降低了自有品牌的市场份额。最后,由于低收入家庭更喜欢价格较高的民族品牌,因此新兴经济体的自有品牌市场份额可能小于发达经济体。这种违反直觉的现象是由两个相互关联的因素驱动的。首先,社会影响力意味着低收入家庭正在向上发展,他们与他们认为较富裕的高收入家庭形成鲜明对比。由于较高收入的家庭购买了民族品牌,因此比较起来会导致人们偏爱民族品牌。其次,低收入家庭对自有品牌的发展一无所知,因此他们更喜欢民族品牌。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pasirayi, Simbarashe.;

  • 作者单位

    Arizona State University.;

  • 授予单位 Arizona State University.;
  • 学科 Marketing.;Business administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 154 p.
  • 总页数 154
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:08

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号