首页> 外文学位 >Re-imagining the contact zone: Ethnic theory and the fiction of Clarence Major, Maxine Hong Kingston, Ana Castillo, and Gerald Vizenor.
【24h】

Re-imagining the contact zone: Ethnic theory and the fiction of Clarence Major, Maxine Hong Kingston, Ana Castillo, and Gerald Vizenor.

机译:重新想象接触区:种族理论和克拉伦斯·梅杰(Clarence Major),Maxine Hong Kingston,Ana Castillo和Gerald Vizenor的小说。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My dissertation undertakes a comparative analysis of the intersections of fiction and theory in African American, Chinese American, Chicana, and Native American writing. I examine the conjunctions and disjunctions between discourses of fiction and theory within what I call an "internal 'contact zone.'" While Mary Louise Pratt's conception of "the contact zone" imagines contact and conflict with an "Other," I conceive the "internal 'contact zone'" as the dialogically agitated space within particular ethnic discourses. I look at the fiction of Clarence Major, Maxine Hong Kingston, Ana Castillo, and Gerald Vizenor alongside theorists like Ann DuCille, Henry Louis Gates, Jr. and bell hooks, Rey Chow and David Palumbo-Liu, Chela Sandoval, Emma Perez, Guillermo Gomez-Pena, and Gloria Anzaldua, and Craig Womack, Elizabeth Cook-Lynn and Robert Warrior, respectively. The most contested issue that emerges from these critical analyses concerns the authenticity and integrity of the ethnic subject. Whereas Kingston and Castillo reinscribe essentialist notions of ethnic selfhood, theorists like Chow and Sandoval complicate and resist static definitions of subjectivity. Major and Vizenor, conversely, deconstruct ethnic identity and racial representation, while theorists like DuCille and Womack retain race and ethnicity as the central constitutive factors in identity formation. My work shows that the discourses of ethnicity within these contact zones are not homogenous, as some might claim, but highly variegated. Also, I argue that the nature of the encounter between fiction and theory within these "internal 'contact zones'" is determined largely by how each ethnic discourse is positioned with respect to dominant culture. For example, Native American critics oppose the critique of the subject because they regard it as an academic version of Western colonialism. By re-imagining the contact zone as the space within ethnic discourse, my work seeks to illuminate the internal dynamics of four ethnic American discursive fields and their complex relationship with dominant culture.
机译:本文对非裔美国人,华裔美国人,奇卡纳人和美国原住民小说中小说与理论的交汇处进行了比较分析。我考察了小说和理论话语之间在我所谓的“内部'接触区'之间的联系和脱节。”虽然玛丽·路易斯·普拉特(Mary Louise Pratt)的“接触区”概念设想与“其他”的接触和冲突,但我认为“内部“接触区””作为特定民族话语中充满对话性的空间。我看的是Clarence Major,Maxine Hong Kingston,Ana Castillo和Gerald Vizenor的小说,以及安·杜西耶(Ann DuCille),亨利·路易斯·盖茨(Henry Louis Gates),Jr。和钟形钩,雷伊·周杰夫(Rey Chow)和戴维·帕伦博·刘(David Palumbo-Liu),谢拉·桑多瓦尔(Chela Sandoval),艾玛·佩雷斯(Emma Perez),吉列尔莫(Guillermo)戈麦斯·佩纳(Gomez-Pena)和格洛里亚(Gloria Anzaldua)和克雷格·沃马克(Craig Womack),伊丽莎白·库克·林恩(Elizabeth Cook-Lynn)和罗伯特·沃里尔(Robert Warrior)分别。从这些批判性分析中出现的最有争议的问题涉及种族主体的真实性和完整性。金斯敦(Kingston)和卡斯蒂略(Castillo)重新诠释了民族自居的本质主义概念,而诸如周杰伦(Chow)和桑多瓦尔(Sandoval)这样的理论家则使复杂和抵制了主观性的静态定义。相反,Major和Vizenor则破坏了种族认同和种族代表,而DuCille和Womack等理论家则将种族和种族保留为身份形成的主要构成因素。我的工作表明,在这些接触区域内,关于种族的论述并不像某些人所声称的那样同质,而是高度多样化的。同样,我认为,在这些“内部'接触区'”中,小说与理论之间相遇的性质很大程度上取决于每种民族话语相对于主流文化的定位。例如,美国原住民评论家反对对该主题的批评,因为他们将其视为西方殖民主义的学术版本。通过将接触区域重新想象为种族话语中的空间,我的工作试图阐明四个美国种族话语领域的内部动态及其与主导文化的复杂关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Carson, Benjamin D.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.;
  • 学科 Literature American.; Sociology Ethnic and Racial Studies.; Black Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 279 p.
  • 总页数 279
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 民族学;人类学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号