首页> 外文学位 >A Comparative Analysis of the Child Behavior Checklist Scores of Traumatized Youth With and Without Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Relative to Nontraumatized Controls.
【24h】

A Comparative Analysis of the Child Behavior Checklist Scores of Traumatized Youth With and Without Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Relative to Nontraumatized Controls.

机译:与未创伤对照组相比,有和没有创伤后应激障碍的创伤青年的儿童行为清单得分的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study compared the CBCL scores of clinically referred youth with PTSD to the CBCL scores of clinically referred traumatized youth without PTSD. It also compared the CBCL scores of youth with PTSD, as well as those of traumatized youth without PTSD, to those of a nontraumatized comparison group. Participants included a total of 123 youth aged 7 through 18 who were tested at Bellevue Hospital in New York City: 34 youth with PTSD, 56 traumatized youth without PTSD, and 33 nontraumatized controls. Participants in the PTSD and traumatized PTSD-negative groups were referred to the study subsequent to exposure to a variety of traumatic events (e.g., sexual assault, physical assault, motor vehicle accident, dog attack). Among the PTSD-positive group, 8 participants met DICA-R criteria for major depression, and 1 met criteria for substance dependence. Of the traumatized PTSD-negative participants, 2 met DICA-R criteria for major depression, 2 met criteria for CD, and 1 met criteria ADHD. Youth with a history of abuse or neglect were excluded. Additional exclusionary criteria included intellectual disability (i.e., IQ ≤ 69), the inability to speak or understand English, a history of significant head trauma, and the use of medication that could influence cognitive functioning.;An ANOVA was used to compare the groups on standardized CBCL Total score, and a MANOVA was performed to test for group differences in standardized CBCL Internalizing and Externalizing aggregate scale scores. A MANCOVA procedure was performed with age, gender, and SES as covariates, to identify significant group differences in CBCL syndrome scale raw scores. Results of all analyses indicated significant differences between groups. The PTSD group had significantly higher CBCL Total and Internalizing aggregate scale scores than both comparison groups and significantly higher Externalizing aggregate scale scores than traumatized PTSD-negatives. No significant differences were observed between the mean CBCL Total, Internalizing aggregate scale, and Externalizing aggregate scale scores of the traumatized PTSD-negatives and nontraumatized controls. The scores of the PTSD-positive group significantly exceeded the scores of both comparison groups on the following CBCL syndrome scales: Anxious/Depressed, Delinquent Behavior, Attention Problems, Thought Problems, and Other Problems. The scores of the PTSD-positives were significantly higher than those of the traumatized PTSD-negatives on the Withdrawn and Somatic Complaints syndrome scales; they significantly exceeded those of nontraumatized controls on the Aggressive Behavior and Social Problems syndrome scales. The CBCL syndrome scale scores of traumatized PTSD-negatives and nontraumatized controls did not significantly differ.;The results of this study suggest that parent-reported internalizing and externalizing behavior problems are associated with PTSD and not with exposure to trauma alone. Its findings also suggest that exposure to trauma in the absence of PTSD is not associated with higher estimates of psychiatric morbidity. As such, this study provides powerful empirical support for the differential validity of the DSM-IV PTSD classification as it applies to children and adolescents.
机译:这项研究将临床转诊的年轻人与PTSD的CBCL得分与临床转诊的未受创伤的年轻人的CBCL得分进行了比较。它还比较了患有创伤后应激障碍的年轻人和没有创伤后应激障碍的受创伤青年的CBCL得分与未进行创伤治疗的对照组的CBCL得分。参与者包括在纽约市贝尔维尤医院接受检查的123名7至18岁的青年:34名患有PTSD的青年,56名没有PTSD的遭受创伤的青年和33名未接受过创伤的对照组。创伤后应激障碍和创伤后创伤后应激障碍阴性组的参与者在暴露于各种创伤事件(例如性攻击,人身攻击,机动车辆事故,狗袭击)之后被转入研究。在PTSD阳性组中,有8名参与者符合重度抑郁的DICA-R标准,有1名符合物质依赖标准。创伤后创伤后应激障碍阴性参与者中,有2名符合重度抑郁的DICA-R标准,2名符合CD标准,1名符合ADHD标准。有虐待或忽视历史的青年被排除在外。其他排除标准包括智力障碍(即,智商≤69),无法说或听懂英语,严重的头部外伤史以及使用可能影响认知功能的药物。标准化CBCL总评分,并进行MANOVA检验标准化CBCL内化和外化总体量表评分中的组别差异。进行MANCOVA程序,将年龄,性别和SES作为协变量,以识别CBCL综合征量表原始评分的显着组差异。所有分析的结果表明各组之间存在显着差异。 PTSD组的CBCL总分和内化总量表得分均明显高于两个对照组,而外伤化总量表得分均高于受创伤的PTSD阴性者。受创伤的PTSD阴性患者和未受伤的对照组的平均CBCL总计,内部化总体量表和外部化总体量表得分之间未观察到显着差异。在以下CBCL综合征量表上,PTSD阳性组的得分明显超过两个对照组的得分:焦虑/沮丧,犯罪行为,注意问题,思想问题和其他问题。在撤回和躯体投诉综合症量表上,PTSD阳性的分数显着高于受创伤的PTSD阴性的分数。在攻击性行为和社会问题综合症量表上,它们大大超过了非创伤性对照。创伤后的PTSD阴性者和非创伤性对照组的CBCL综合征量表得分没有显着差异。这项研究的结果表明,父母报告的内在化和外在化行为问题与PTSD相关,而与单独暴露于创伤无关。研究结果还表明,在没有PTSD的情况下暴露于创伤与更高的精神病发病率估计值无关。因此,这项研究为DSM-IV PTSD分类适用于儿童和青少年提供了有力的经验支持。

著录项

  • 作者

    Westphal, Elizabeth L.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Psychology Behavioral.;Psychology Developmental.;Education Educational Psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 148 p.
  • 总页数 148
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号