首页> 外文学位 >Working time over the 20th century: A macroeconomic perspective.
【24h】

Working time over the 20th century: A macroeconomic perspective.

机译:二十世纪的工作时间:宏观经济观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over the last 130 years weekly hours worked per employed person, the workweek length, decreased by 41 percent in today's advanced industrialized countries. The number of employed persons in the population 15 or older, the employment rate, displays large movements but no clear secular pattern. These facts motivated the question: What accounts for the large decrease in the workweek length and the development of the employment rate?; The first essay presents ex ante promising theories. It considers among others: technological progress, proportional taxes, workweek length constraints, and changes in the sectoral composition of the economy. The main finding is that all theories fail to account for the facts. Some of the theories predict a constant workweek length; others that allow for a decrease of the workweek length have counterfactual implications.; Essay two proposes an answer to the question in a dynamic general equilibrium framework. Making use of the observation that employed persons are not a homogenous group, supervisory workers and production workers are introduced. Both types of workers get more productive over time. The productivity gains of supervisors lead to the decrease in the workweek length. In a calibrated version of the model, productivity gains of supervisors account for a large fraction of the decline in the workweek length of Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The model, augmented to include taxes, government spending, and technological progress, captures the movement in the employment rates of the three countries.; Essay three addresses the question: What is the impact of labor unions on working time? In the model labor unions maximize the utility of the average employed person through the choice of the workweek length. Under reasonable parameter restrictions, the essay finds that the presence of labor unions implies a shorter workweek length compared to a non-union economy. The model is then applied to the United Kingdom for the period 1910 to 1930. Augmented with taxes and a switch from an economy without unions to one with unions as decision makers, the model accounts for the observed workweek length and employment rate decline.
机译:在过去的130年中,当今发达的工业化国家中,每个就业人员的每周工作时间(每周工作时间)减少了41%。 15岁或15岁以上人口中的就业人数,就业率显示出较大的变动,但没有明显的长期现象。这些事实引发了一个问题:什么原因导致工作周长度的大幅减少和就业率的提高?第一篇论文提出了事前有希望的理论。它考虑了其他方面:技术进步,比例税收,工作周长度限制以及经济部门构成的变化。主要发现是所有理论都无法解释事实。一些理论预测工作周的长度是恒定的。其他允许减少工作周长度的问题具有反事实含义。论文二提出了在动态一般均衡框架下对该问题的答案。利用从业人员不是同质群体的观点,引入了监督工人和生产工人。随着时间的推移,这两种类型的工人的生产率都会提高。主管的生产率提高导致每周工作时间减少。在模型的校准版本中,主管的生产率提高占日本,英国和美国工作周长度下降的很大一部分。该模型增加了税收,政府支出和技术进步的内容,反映了三个国家就业率的变化。文章三解决了这个问题:工会对工作时间有什么影响?在该模型中,工会通过选择工作周长来最大化普通雇员的效用。在合理的参数限制下,本文发现与非工会经济相比,工会的存在意味着每周工作时间的缩短。然后将该模型应用于1910年至1930年的英国。由于税收增加以及从没有工会的经济转变为有工会作为决策者的经济,该模型解释了观察到的每周工作时间和就业率下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号