首页> 外文学位 >Purity of thought: Dualism and divinization in Greek philosophy.
【24h】

Purity of thought: Dualism and divinization in Greek philosophy.

机译:思想的纯洁:希腊哲学中的二元论和神化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Despite their disagreements, many ancient Greek philosophers agree that thought is divine. To Aristotle, indeed, God just is a kind of thought---the kind that actively thinks itself (Metaph. 12.9). In the conclusion of Nicomachean Ethics (10.6--8), Aristotle enjoins us to live a life of pure thought (nous), since such a life is divine in comparison with a merely human one. Although this injunction has embarrassed some commentators, who see it as inconsistent with his naturalistic anthropocentrism, this dissertation concludes that it represents the very heart of his philosophy.; Aristotle, it is argued, inherited a program of purification and divinization from Plato. This program has three main tenets: (i) God is pure thought; (ii) the human is a hybrid of divine thought and mortal nature; (iii) the goal of philosophy is to purify thought of its mortal entanglements, and thus to divinize the philosopher. Plato, in turn, appropriates this program from the Pythagoreans, but synthesizes it with four contributions from other Presocratics: (i) the purity of thought exalted by Anaxagoras; (ii) the self-intellection of the divine articulated by Parmenides; (iii) the divinity of thought proposed by Xenophanes and Heraclitus; and (iv) the correspondence between cosmos and soul introduced by the Milesians.; Beginning with these Milesians, then, this dissertation tells a history of Greek philosophy from Thales to Aristotle, tracing the origins, development, and refinement of its persistent program of purification and divinization. Special attention is paid to Plato and Aristotle, focusing on the following topics: the importance of contemplation in their ethics; the role of images---especially the metaphors of light and vision---in their epistemologies; and finally, the picture of selfhood that emerges from their psychologies. According to this picture, we are distinct from our humanity. The pure thought we really are, claim Plato and Aristotle, must be separated from our bodies, and from the imagination, emotion, and appetite these bodies produce. Until death, philosophy is the means of this separation. In compensation for this painful process, though, Plato and Aristotle promise us the consolation of divinity.
机译:尽管有分歧,但许多古希腊哲学家都认为思想是神圣的。实际上,对亚里士多德而言,上帝只是一种思想,一种积极地自我思考的思想(Metaph。12.9)。在《尼科马奇伦理学》(10.6--8)的结论中,亚里士多德(Aristotle)要求我们过一种纯思想的生活(nous),因为与仅仅人类的生活相比,这种生活是神圣的。尽管这一禁令使一些评论家感到尴尬,他们认为这与他的自然主义人类中心主义相矛盾,但本文得出的结论是,这是他哲学的核心。有人说,亚里斯多德继承了柏拉图的提纯和神化计划。该计划有三个主要原则:(i)上帝是纯思想; (ii)人类是神圣思想与凡人本性的混合体; (iii)哲学的目标是净化思想的凡间纠缠,从而使哲学家神化。柏拉图反过来从毕达哥拉斯学派中使用了该程序,但又将其与其他苏格拉底主义者的四项贡献进行了综合:(i)阿纳克萨格拉斯崇高的思想纯洁性; (ii)帕门尼德斯所表达的神的自我理解; (iii)Xenophanes和Heraclitus提出的思想神性; (iv)迈尔斯人提出的宇宙与灵魂之间的对应关系;然后,从这些迈里安主义者开始,本文介绍了从泰勒斯到亚里斯多德的希腊哲学史,追溯了其持久的提纯和神化计划的起源,发展和完善。柏拉图和亚里士多德特别关注以下主题:沉思在其伦理学中的重要性;图像-尤其是光和视觉的隐喻-在它们的认识论中的作用;最后,他们的心理产生了自我的画面。根据这张照片,我们与我们的人类截然不同。柏拉图和亚里士多德声称,我们真正的纯思想必须与我们的身体,这些身体产生的想象力,情感和食欲分开。直到死亡,哲学才是这种分离的手段。为了弥补这一痛苦的过程,柏拉图和亚里士多德向我们保证了神性的安慰。

著录项

  • 作者

    Miller, Patrick Lee.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 Literature Classical.; Religion Philosophy of.; Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 259 p.
  • 总页数 259
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界文学;宗教理论、宗教思想;哲学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号