首页> 外文学位 >An evaluation of the depiction of Native Americans in children's literature published in the 1950s.
【24h】

An evaluation of the depiction of Native Americans in children's literature published in the 1950s.

机译:对1950年代出版的儿童文学中美洲原住民的描述进行的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Scope and method of study. The methodology of content analysis was an aid in trying to determine what multicultural criteria was present in the children's literature books, which portrayed Native Americans published in the 1950s and still in use in five public libraries which serve Native Americans. The major focus of this study covered the following areas: (1) Quality children's literature that focuses on various cultures will help children learn acceptance, and tolerance regardless of their ethnic differences and eliminate cultural misconceptions and stereotyping previously learned. (2) The researcher conducted an evaluation of multicultural literature found in five Oklahoma public libraries identified as portraying Native Americans in children's literature published in the 1950s.; Findings and conclusions. Looking at the total frequency of all six books, the criteria category which appeared the most was Characterization/Stereotyping (n = 724) closely followed by inappropriate Language/Lexicon (n = 683) and the criterion which appeared the least was Historical Inaccuracy (n = 186), Cultural Inauthenticity (n = 227) and Other (n = 24). When examining the frequency in which Language/Lexicon found in Tecumseh: Destiny's Warrior criteria "Were Indian's labeled friendly or unfriendly" (n = 115) and the least in Winged Moccasins: the story of Sacajawea (n = 20). However, Characterization/Stereotyping the criterion "Did characters show characterization or stereotyping" appeared the most in Winged Moccasins: The story of Sacajawea (n = 145) and found the least in Rifles for Watie (n = 4). Due to their having the lowest number of historical inaccuracies Winged Moccasins: the story of Sacajawea (n = 14) and Rifles for Watie (n = 35) were the only two books that the raters would recommend for children; the other books were found to be more suitable for adults.
机译:研究范围和方法。内容分析的方法有助于确定儿童文学书籍中存在的多元文化标准,这些书籍描绘了1950年代出版的美国原住民,至今仍在为美国原住民服务的五个公共图书馆中使用。这项研究的主要重点包括以下几个方面:(1)专注于各种文化的优质儿童文学将帮助儿童学习接纳和宽容,而不论他们的种族差异如何,并消除以前学到的文化误解和陈规定型观念。 (2)研究人员对在俄克拉荷马州的五个公共图书馆中发现的多元文化文献进行了评估,这些图书馆被确定为在1950年代出版的儿童文学中刻画了美国原住民。结论和结论。从全部六本书的总频率来看,出现最多的标准类别是刻画/刻板印象(n = 724),紧随其后的是不恰当的语言/词典(n = 683),出现最少的标准是历史不准确度(n = 186),文化不真实(n = 227)和其他(n = 24)。在检查语言/词典在Tecumseh中的出现频率时:Destiny的战士标准“被印度人标记为友好还是不友好”(n = 115),而在“翅莫卡辛鞋”中最少:Sacajawea的故事(n = 20)。但是,“有特征的角色表现出特征或刻板印象”的刻画/刻板印象标准出现在双翅莫卡辛鞋中:Sacajawea的故事(n = 145),在步枪的Watie中则最少(n = 4)。由于他们的历史不准确率最低,双翅莫卡辛人:萨卡佳薇(n = 14)和步枪步枪(n = 35)的故事是评估者推荐给儿童的仅有的两本书。发现其他书籍更适合成年人。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Oklahoma State University.;

  • 授予单位 Oklahoma State University.;
  • 学科 Education Elementary.; Education Language and Literature.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 113 p.
  • 总页数 113
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 初等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号