首页> 外文学位 >Developing a Critical Dialog for Educational Technology: Understanding the Nature of Technology and the Legacy of Scientific Management in Our Schools.
【24h】

Developing a Critical Dialog for Educational Technology: Understanding the Nature of Technology and the Legacy of Scientific Management in Our Schools.

机译:开发教育技术的关键对话:了解我们学校的技术本质和科学管理的遗产。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the legacy of scientific management and the dominance of one-dimensional thinking in the field of educational technology. Through this analysis, I demonstrate that the ways practitioners and policymakers frame educational technology, assess its effectiveness, and make judgments about its potential, often exclude essential reference points such as the origins of the field, the nature of technology and alternative critical frameworks. In order to properly evaluate educational technology, it is necessary to unpack and explore the historical, moral, and political motives that frame current thinking in the field. To that end, the ideas of the father of scientific management, Fredrick W. Taylor, and critical theorist, Herbert Marcuse, were examined around five themes: truth, human nature, relationship to society, nature of technology, and the aims of education. These themes were then applied to a textual analysis of the National Educational Technology Plans from 1996 through 2010 to demonstrate the prevalence of techno-rational language in recent national educational technology policy. The conclusion identifies ways for policymakers and practitioners to recognize and critically engage with techno-rational thought and the nature of technology in the field of educational technology.
机译:本文考察了科学管理的遗产以及一维思维在教育技术领域的主导地位。通过这一分析,我证明了从业者和政策制定者构架教育技术,评估其有效性以及对其潜力进行判断的方式,常常排除了诸如领域的起源,技术性质和替代性关键框架之类的基本参考点。为了正确评估教育技术,有必要对构成该领域当前思想的历史,道德和政治动机进行分解和探索。为此,科学管理之父弗雷德里克·W·泰勒(Fredrick W. Taylor)和批判理论家赫伯特·马尔库塞(Herbert Marcuse)的思想围绕五个主题进行了研究:真理,人性,与社会的关系,技术的本质以及教育的目标。然后将这些主题应用于1996年至2010年国家教育技术计划的文本分析,以证明技术理性语言在最近的国家教育技术政策中盛行。结论为决策者和从业者确定了认识和批判性地参与技术理性思想和教育技术领域技术本质的方式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Frizelle, Thomas Kenneth.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Washington.;

  • 授予单位 University of Washington.;
  • 学科 Education Leadership.;Education Philosophy of.;Education Technology of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 150 p.
  • 总页数 150
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:25

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号