首页> 外文学位 >Cosmetic Safety Regulations: A Comparative Study of Europe, the USA and Malaysia
【24h】

Cosmetic Safety Regulations: A Comparative Study of Europe, the USA and Malaysia

机译:化妆品安全法规:欧洲,美国和马来西亚的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The need for product safety regulation is no longer a source of debate. It should be the primary aim in any consumer protection policy. This is due to the fact that there are a lot of consumer goods that are heterogeneous and more technologically advanced that are continually being introduced to consumers. Cosmetic products are currently one of the most popular consumer products. Their increase in sales is evident globally including in developing countries. They are no longer solely associated with women but are being used by all people, of all ages. With such popularity, cosmetics producers are eager to make a profit, which sometimes has resulted in the introduction of cosmetics which are not safe and cause adverse effects. This suggests that there might be a loophole in the adequacy of the safety laws or regulations. The possibility of these safety issues occurring anywhere is generally acknowledged, which makes it a global issue. Although such cases are not as frequent as for other consumer goods such as foods or pharmaceuticals, there is a need to investigate the cosmetics safety mechanisms in order to see if consumers are adequately protected and if the safety mechanisms for cosmetics are efficient. In realising this aim, the study takes three jurisdictions to compare, namely the EU, the USA and Malaysia. Through analysis, the ideal features of cosmetics regulations based on the larger picture of safety regulation generally are also considered. This study contrasts the EU and Malaysia, that have in place government regulation of cosmetics, with the USA that has a different regime for cosmetics, more dependent on self-regulation. Out of the three, Malaysia is the newest country that has introduced a new law on cosmetic products and this has been adopted from the EU model. Although discussions on cosmetic regulations have been undertaken in Malaysia, the legal safety issues to which they give rise have not been investigated systematically in comparison with the EU and the USA. Even in these jurisdictions cosmetics safety is not discussed as much as other consumer products. This thesis also investigates why Malaysia has adopted the EU policy and not some other policy such as the American one. Once the above issues have been considered, the impact of the new emerging technology of nano-cosmetics is analysed. The thesis found that, Malaysia, as with any newly introduced system, has experienced some setbacks and encountered teething problems due to a lack of resources, structure, technical facilities and qualified personnel. However, as a developing nation, it certainly has benefited from the adoption of the EU system. Although there is still much room for improvement, this borrowing has benefited consumers, in so far as safety is concerned, because of the common and standard safety assessments and the responsibility of safety now being placed on the manufacturers. Consumers can also enjoy more products due to the elimination of trade barriers through free movement and cooperation between member states.
机译:产品安全法规的需求不再是争论的焦点。这应该是任何消费者保护政策的主要目标。这是由于以下事实:有许多种类繁多,技术更先进的消费品不断被引入到消费者手中。化妆品是当前最受欢迎的消费产品之一。它们在全球的销售增长明显,包括在发展中国家。它们不再仅仅与女性联系在一起,而是被所有年龄段的所有人所使用。在这样的普及下,化妆品生产商渴望获利,这有时导致引入不安全并引起不利影响的化妆品。这表明安全法律或法规的适当性可能存在漏洞。这些安全问题在任何地方发生的可能性都是公认的,这使其成为全球性问题。尽管这种情况不像其他消费品(例如食品或药品)那样频繁,但仍需要研究化妆品安全机制,以了解消费者是否受到足够的保护以及化妆品的安全机制是否有效。为了实现这一目标,该研究采用了三个司法管辖区进行比较,即欧盟,美国和马来西亚。通过分析,通常还会考虑基于较大安全法规的化妆品法规的理想特征。这项研究将欧盟和马来西亚(已对化妆品进行政府管制)与美国(针对化妆品的制度不同,但其对自我监管的依赖程度不同)进行了对比。在这三个国家中,马来西亚是引入了有关化妆品的新法律的最新国家,并已从欧盟模式中采纳。尽管马来西亚已经进行了有关化妆品法规的讨论,但与欧盟和美国相比,化妆品法规引发的法律安全问题尚未得到系统的研究。即使在这些管辖区,化妆品安全性也没有像其他消费品那样受到重视。本文还研究了马来西亚为何采用欧盟政策而不是美国等其他政策的原因。一旦考虑了上述问题,就可以分析新兴的纳米化妆品技术的影响。论文发现,由于缺乏资源,结构,技术设施和人才,马来西亚与其他新引入的系统一样,都遭受了一些挫折并遇到了前途问题。但是,作为一个发展中国家,它当然得益于欧盟体系的采用。尽管仍有很多改进的余地,但是就安全而言,这种借贷使消费者受益,这是因为通用和标准的安全评估以及制造商现在承担的安全责任。由于成员国之间的自由流动和合作消除了贸易壁垒,因此消费者也可以享受更多产品。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zakaria, Zalina.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Manchester (United Kingdom).;

  • 授予单位 The University of Manchester (United Kingdom).;
  • 学科 Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 282 p.
  • 总页数 282
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号