首页> 外文学位 >'Strange contrasts': Intersubjectivity and the cohesion of romance in the novels of Charlotte Bronte and Jean Rhys (Dominica).
【24h】

'Strange contrasts': Intersubjectivity and the cohesion of romance in the novels of Charlotte Bronte and Jean Rhys (Dominica).

机译:“奇怪的对比”:夏洛特·勃朗特和让·里斯(多米尼加)小说中的主体间性和浪漫的凝聚力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My dissertation analyzes the use of romantic conceptions of love in the work of Charlotte Bronte and Jean Rhys by contextualizing romance within the psychoanalytic frameworks of mutual recognition and intersubjective affirmations. Within the tradition of women's romantic fiction, Bronte's Jane Eyre is a paradigmatic text, outlining the romantic heroine's search for an idealized other who will recognize and authenticate her subjectivity. The common dismissal of this novel as a trivial romantic narrative is most famously summed up by Virginia Woolf's criticism of Jane Eyre: "Always to be a governess and always to be in love is a serious limitation in a world which is full, after all, of people who are neither one nor the other." But if we consider Jane Eyre and her successors' tendency "always to be in love" in the light of contemporary psychoanalytic theories, their romantic predilection assumes a new significance: their need for love emerges not as a "serious limitation" but as a means of transcending their limitations. I argue that these characters are not seeking a man to complete them; rather, they are seeking recognition and affirmation of their independent identity. Deprived of a facilitating environment that would foster their emotional and psychic development, these heroines seek love objects who will enable them to heal their divided psyches and authenticate their sense of self. To reconcile their "strange contrasts," they seek a romantic partner who can see through their external reserve and recognize the full complexity of their character. Bronte and Rhys suggest, however, that this romantic fantasy is not an easily achieved reality. Both authors analyze the common breakdown of mutual recognition and its origins but also consider how---and whether---the negative pattern can be broken. Bronte has a more optimistic view of love's potential to heal the self, whereas Rhys takes a more fatalistic perspective on love's potential to destroy the self. My dissertation thus complicates the traditional assessment of Bronte's and Rhys's novels, since even sympathetic readings of their works take a dismissive attitude toward their romantic plots.
机译:我的论文通过在相互承认和主体间肯定的精神分析框架内将浪漫主义情境化,分析了夏洛特·勃朗特和让·里斯在浪漫主义爱情观中的运用。在女性浪漫主义小说的传统中,勃朗特的《简爱》是一个范式文本,概述了浪漫主义女主人公对理想化他人的追求,这些人会认识并验证她的主观性。弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫(Virginia Woolf)对简·艾尔(Jane Eyre)的批评最能概括这部小说作为琐碎的浪漫叙事而被普遍否定的原因:“在一个充斥着一切的世界中,永远要做女教师,永远相爱是一个严重的局限,彼此都不是的人。”但是,如果我们根据当代精神分析理论认为简爱和她的继任者的倾向“总是相爱”,那么他们对浪漫的偏爱就具有了新的意义:对爱情的需求不是作为“严重限制”出现的,而是作为一种手段出现的。超越其局限性。我认为这些角色并不是在寻找一个能完成这些任务的人。相反,他们正在寻求对其独立身份的认可和肯定。这些女主人公被剥夺了促进他们的情感和心理发展的便利环境,因此寻找爱情对象,使他们能够治愈自己分散的心理,并证明自己的自我意识。为了调和他们的“奇怪的对比”,他们寻求一个浪漫的伴侣,他们可以透过自己的外在储备看到并认识到他们性格的全部复杂性。但是,勃朗特(Bronte)和瑞斯(Rhys)提出,这种浪漫的幻想并非易事。两位作者都分析了相互承认的常见细分及其起源,但同时也考虑了如何(以及是否)打破负面模式。勃朗特(Bronte)对爱情治愈自己的潜力抱有更为乐观的看法,而瑞斯(Rhys)对爱情破坏自我的潜力持更为宿命的态度。因此,我的论文使对勃朗特和里斯的小说的传统评估复杂化,因为即使是同情的作品,他们对浪漫情节的态度也被轻描淡写。

著录项

  • 作者

    Williams, Anjali Joline.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Davis.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Davis.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.; Literature English.; Literature Caribbean.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 269 p.
  • 总页数 269
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 文学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号