首页> 外文学位 >Third Way Poets: Navigating the Streams of Modern and Postmodern Poetic Uncertainty.
【24h】

Third Way Poets: Navigating the Streams of Modern and Postmodern Poetic Uncertainty.

机译:第三路诗人:探寻现代和后现代诗学的不确定性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the career arcs of four representative current poets in order to develop a tentative narrative to account for recent and emergent poetic practice. Poets who began publishing between the 1970s and 1990s inherited two powerful aesthetic traditions. On the one hand, they write in the shadow of postmodern poets who find liberation in the embrace of radical linguistic, epistemological/ontological, or subjective uncertainty and exhibit intense skepticism about intellectual closure or claims of privilege for aesthetic production. On the other hand, they also find aesthetic reserves in the work of high modernists who felt they faced similar philosophical or aesthetic uncertainties, but whose poems generally made claims for privileged aesthetic construction to contain or manage them. However, the poetry crafted by Jorie Graham, Frank Bidart, Carl Phillips, and Henri Cole neither wholly embraces radical ontological/epistemological, linguistic, or subjective uncertainty, nor wholly puts faith in permanent aesthetic resolutions of it. Rather, their poems negotiate between the poetic terms set by immediate and less immediate predecessors in a "neither/nor" fashion. This entails the crafting of poems which exhibit history as neither continuous nor discontinuous, but as ongoing chaotic evolution; which employ self-conscious linguistic strategies to give tenuous parameters for the self; which act as neither solely public nor solely private communications, but public methods of intimate exchange between reader and writer; which re-use a large body of self-generated work to connect the self of the writer to that self's material history; and which make claims, though chastened, for the value of a high art aesthetic. The poems produced by these "third way" poets, work to rehabilitate, in a chastened way, the function of the poem as a space for the development of a contingently coherent sense of self in relationship to the self of the other/reader. Once this relationship is established, so the poems of these writers often claim, both reader and writer, as selves stabilized by the readerly/writerly relationship, can begin to counteract the alienation produced by ontological and epistemological uncertainty and ongoing historical flux.
机译:本文研究了四位具有代表性的当下诗人的职业生涯,以期发展出一种试探性的叙事方式来说明近期和新兴的诗歌实践。在1970年代至1990年代开始出版的诗人继承了两种强大的美学传统。一方面,他们写在后现代诗人的阴影下,他们在激进的语言学,认识论/本体论或主观不确定性的怀抱中找到了解放,并对知识的封闭或对审美生产的特权主张表现出强烈的怀疑。另一方面,他们在高级现代主义者的作品中也发现了美学上的保留,他们感到自己面临着相似的哲学或美学上的不确定性,但他们的诗一般都要求特权美学的建构来遏制或管理它们。但是,乔里·格雷厄姆(Jorie Graham),弗兰克·比达特(Frank Bidart),卡尔·菲利普斯(Carl Phillips)和亨利·科尔(Henri Cole)创作的诗歌既不完全接受激进的本体论/认识论,语言学或主观的不确定性,也完全不相信其永久性的美学分辨率。而是,他们的诗歌以“不/不”的方式在直接和较不直接的前辈所设定的诗歌术语之间进行协商。这就需要对诗歌进行精心制作,这些诗歌既不连续也不间断,但呈现出不断的混沌演变。运用自我意识的语言策略为自我赋予脆弱的参数;它们不仅充当公共或私人通信,而且充当读者与作家之间亲密交流的公共方法;重用大量自我生成的作品来将作家的自我与该自我的物质历史联系起来;并尽管提出了要求,但仍要求具有较高的艺术美学价值。由这些“第三种方式”的诗人创作的诗,以一种被惩罚的方式恢复了诗歌的功能,使之成为与他人/读者的自我发展成一种持续一致的自我感的空间。一旦建立了这种关系,那么这些作家的诗歌就常常声称,读者和作家,由于受到读者/作家关系的稳定,可以开始抵消本体论和认识论的不确定性以及持续的历史变化所产生的疏远。

著录项

  • 作者

    Richie, James.;

  • 作者单位

    Northeastern University.;

  • 授予单位 Northeastern University.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.;Literature American.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 258 p.
  • 总页数 258
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号