首页> 外文学位 >Where everything is possible: Hannah Arendt on freedom and the question of evil.
【24h】

Where everything is possible: Hannah Arendt on freedom and the question of evil.

机译:在一切皆有可能的地方:汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)谈自由与邪恶问题。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The study attempts to re-think the sense and significance of Hannah Arendt's engagement with the question of evil, and to bring out the hitherto concealed relation that obtains between this question and Arendt's celebrated theory of political action. It is argued that Arendt's engagement must be located on the philosophical plane, and that notwithstanding Arendt's deflationary language, her contribution must be grasped as a response to that powerful line of thinking about evil that begins with Kant and Schelling and culminates in Heidegger's ontological investigations. To speak of the 'question of evil' in Arendt is, of course, to speak of a lengthy path, a notoriously winding path marked by numerous complicated twists and turns, suspensions and displacements, and (at least the appearance of) a single decisive break or reversal. In speaking of a concealed relation, the author does not mean to suggest that at a certain isolable juncture on this path, the confrontation with evil suddenly intersects with an extrinsic concern and prompts Arendt to raise the question of political action. Rather, once Arendt's theory of political action is itself understood in its full radicality; once it is wrenched away from its fashionable interpretation as a systematic renewal of the Aristotelian praxis, and its essentially post-traditional starting point and intention is recognized; then it becomes possible, as it were, to overthrow the entrenched opposition of 'radical' and 'banal' evil that has structured virtually every philosophical interpretation of Arendt on evil, and which has effectively prevented us from appreciating the real stakes of Arendt's thought. It becomes possible, from the vantage point of what Arendt calls the 'brokenness' of tradition, to subject this opposition to a thorough investigation as to its roots, its characteristic metaphors, its assumptions, its firmness. Moreover, and perhaps for the first time, it becomes possible to grasp the surprising continuity that links Arendt's earliest thoughts on evil to her last, from the initial meditations on Nazism and 'absolute evil' to her very late reflections on mental processes, and their possible conditioning of man against evildoing.
机译:该研究试图重新思考汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)参与邪恶问题的意义和意义,并找出迄今为止在这个问题与阿伦特(Arendt)著名的政治行动理论之间隐藏的关系。有人认为,阿伦特的参与必须位于哲学层面上,尽管有阿伦特的通缩语言,但她的贡献必须作为对以康德和席林为开端的邪恶思想的回应,并在海德格尔的本体论研究中达到顶点。当然,在阿伦特说“邪恶的问题”,是指一条漫长的道路,一个臭名昭著的曲折道路,其特征是无数复杂的曲折,悬置和位移,以及(至少是一个决定性的)外观突破或逆转。说到一种隐蔽的关系,作者并不是要暗示在这条道路上某个可隔离的关头,与邪恶的冲突突然与外部关切相交,并促使阿伦特提出政治行动问题。相反,一旦阿伦特的政治行动理论本身就被完全激进地理解了;一旦它脱离了对时尚的解释,即对亚里士多德实践的系统性更新,它的本质就在后传统的出发点和意图就得到了认可;则有可能推翻“激进的”和“平庸的”邪恶的根深蒂固的反对意见,这种反对实际上构成了对阿伦特关于邪恶的每一种哲学解释,并有效地阻止了我们欣赏阿伦特思想的真正利益。从阿伦特所说的传统的“破碎性”的优势出发,有可能使这种反对派对其根源,特征隐喻,假设和牢固性进行彻底的研究。而且,也许是第一次,有可能掌握令人惊讶的连续性,从阿伦特对邪恶的最早思想到她的最后思想之间的联系,从对纳粹主义和“绝对邪恶”的最初沉思到对心理过程及其反应的晚期反思。可能使人免受邪恶之害。

著录项

  • 作者

    Brandes, Daniel.;

  • 作者单位

    Northwestern University.;

  • 授予单位 Northwestern University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 318 p.
  • 总页数 318
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:41:59

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号