首页> 外文学位 >Victorian war correspondents G. A. Henty and H. M. Stanley: The 'Abyssinian' campaign, 1867--1868.
【24h】

Victorian war correspondents G. A. Henty and H. M. Stanley: The 'Abyssinian' campaign, 1867--1868.

机译:维多利亚时代的战地记者G.A.亨蒂和H.M.斯坦利:“阿比西尼亚”战役,1867--1868年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Contemporary historians of the British military expedition to Abyssinia (hereafter called Ethiopia) generally ascribed the source of the Ethiopian conflict to the lack of a reply from Queen Victoria to a letter from Tewodros II, in which he requested military aid and the exchange of ambassadors. The victorious campaign enhanced the power and prestige of Britain in both Europe and the Middle East. In the extant literature, however, the role of the “specials,” George A. Henty and Henry M. Stanley, assigned to report on the conduct of the war, has yet to be examined.;This study was undertaken in an effort to better understand the history of war reporting by civilians. Why were war correspondents deemed necessary, and how could civilians understand and effectively convey the facts of the conflict? How influential were the correspondents' descriptions of a virtually unknown people on the reading public? How willing were the correspondents to treat both sides fairly, and how would that accord with the editorial tone of the newspaper. Finally, while the presence of the correspondents may not have directly affected the outcome of the conflict, was it possible that correspondents, such as Henty and Stanley, exerted more influence on the newspaper readership than others because of their strong imperial views?;Inevitably, the correspondents' reports on Ethiopia informed the views of their readership, and shaped their ideas on non-European peoples and imperial expansion. Significantly, as the Empire grew, Henty's and Stanley's imperialistic views gained in popularity, and Henty's fictional boy heroes helped a generation envision the qualities necessary for the colonial administrator. Stanley's African explorations in search of Dr. Livingstone captured the imagination of the world, and enhanced the idea of imperial expansion. Both correspondents made significant contributions to the history of war literature by writing books composed of their dispatches.
机译:英军远征阿比西尼亚(以下称埃塞俄比亚)的当代历史学家们普遍将埃塞俄比亚冲突的根源归因于维多利亚女王未回复图杜德罗斯二世的信,他在信中要求提供军事援助并交换大使。这场胜利的战役增强了英国在欧洲和中东的力量和威望。但是,在现有文献中,尚未对“专职人员”的角色(乔治·亨提和亨利·斯坦利被指派负责报告战争的行为)进行研究。更好地了解平民报告战争的历史。为什么战争通讯员被认为是必要的,平民如何理解和有效传达冲突的事实?记者对阅读界中一个几乎未知的人的描述有多大影响?记者如何公平地对待双方,这与报纸的社论语气如何相符。最后,虽然记者的在场可能并没有直接影响冲突的结果,但由于轩尼诗和斯坦利等人的强大的帝国主义观点,他们对报纸读者的影响可能会比其他人更大吗?埃塞俄比亚的记者报道传达了读者的观点,并塑造了他们对非欧洲人民和帝国扩张的看法。值得注意的是,随着帝国的发展,轩蒂和斯坦利的帝国主义观点广受欢迎,轩蒂的虚构的男孩英雄帮助一代人预见了殖民地行政官所必需的素质。斯坦利在非洲寻找利文斯通的探险活动捕捉了世界的想象力,并增强了帝国扩张的思想。两位记者通过撰写由其派遣人员撰写的书籍,为战争文学史做出了重要贡献。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hoover, Nora K.;

  • 作者单位

    The Florida State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Florida State University.;
  • 学科 Biography.;History Middle Eastern.;History European.;History Modern.;History African.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 155 p.
  • 总页数 155
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号