首页> 外文学位 >Three Essays on the Economics of Health in Developing Countries.
【24h】

Three Essays on the Economics of Health in Developing Countries.

机译:关于发展中国家卫生经济学的三篇论文。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation consists of three chapters that address health issues in developing countries. The first two chapters study Ghana's social health insurance program, the National Health Insurance Scheme. Many developing countries have recently instituted social health insurance schemes (SHIs) to ease financial barriers to utilization of healthcare services and help mitigate the effects of adverse health shocks. Although these SHIs offer generous terms and benefits, enrollment remains low especially among the poorest households who are the intended primary beneficiaries. The first two chapters are based on randomized field interventions implemented in the Wa West district of the Upper West Region of Ghana to (a) understand the reasons for low enrollment in SHIs; (b) estimate the effects of insurance coverage on utilization of healthcare services, financial protection and health outcomes, and c) learn about how resource-constrained households allocate health resources among its members. The interventions were increased convenience of signing for insurance, an education intervention that provided information about the insurance program, and a subsidy intervention that included varying levels of subsidies for insurance premiums.;The first chapter deals with objectives (a) and (b). The results show that inadequate information about the insurance program, and insurance premium and fees affect enrollment. The results also show that the demand for insurance is price elastic in the sense that small subsidies generate substantial enrollment effects. Insurance coverage leads to increased utilization of healthcare services, reduced out-of-pocket payments among individuals with prior positive expenses and ,moderate improvement in health outcomes. The results suggest strong complementarities between providing information and providing subsidies in utilization and health outcomes, an indication of the importance of the combined interventions for achieving changes in health-seeking behavior and outcomes.;The second chapter focuses on objective (c): intra-household allocation of health resources among resource-constrained households. The analysis in this chapter is based on households who were assigned to receive subsidies only and the pure control group. Two types of vouchers were issued to households who did not receive full subsidies: one that allowed households to decide how to allocate subsidy among its members and one in which they had no control over the allocation. This chapter compares within household enrollment patterns across these two vouchers. The results suggest that households prioritize children in the presence of resource constraints. Among children, households who were allowed to determine allocation of subsidy amounts enroll 11.7 percentage or 18% more boys than girls. The results suggest that these patterns of allocation cannot be explained by baseline health conditions or expected health. The chater presents supporting evidence that differential labor market participation is a likely explanation for the differential allocation by gender among children: among children aged 7-17 years, labor market participation is 3.6 percentage points higher for boys than girls.;The third and final chapter is coauthored with Ayaga A. Bawah and James F. Phillips. The chapter seeks to explore how the quasi-experimental introduction of reproductive and family planning services affects the fertility behavior of different socio-economic groups in a rural African setting. We combine a quasi-experimental introduction of reproductive and family planning services in the Kassena-Nankana districts in the Upper East Region of Ghana with longitudinal data from the Navrongo Health and Demographic Surveillance System to quantify the differential fertility effects of the interventions by socio-economic status (as measured by woman's education status, her husband's education status and wealth). We track the fertility behavior and outcomes of more than 24,000 women in their reproductive age (15-49) over a period of eighteen years. Our results show that before the interventions educated women did not have significantly fewer children, but desired lower family sizes and were more likely to use modern contraceptives. However, husband's education was associated with lower fertility especially when their wives were also educated. Wealth was associated with higher fertility, reflecting a higher child survival rate in wealthy families. Moreover, controlling for wealth does not affect the effect of education on fertility. We find that the reproductive health interventions affected both educated and uneducated women but the effect on educated women was stronger, leading to the emergence of an education-fertility differential 16 years after the introduction of the interventions. Our results suggest that in settings where men dominate reproductive decision-making, their education status may have a stronger effect on fertility than the educational attainment of women.
机译:本文由三章组成,分别论述了发展中国家的健康问题。前两章研究加纳的社会健康保险计划,即国家健康保险计划。许多发展中国家最近建立了社会健康保险计划(SHI),以减轻使用医疗保健服务的财务障碍,并帮助减轻不良健康冲击的影响。尽管这些SHI提供了慷慨的条款和福利,但入学率仍然很低,尤其是在最贫穷的家庭中,这些家庭是预期的主要受益者。前两章基于在加纳上西部地区的Wa West地区实施的随机现场干预,以(a)了解SHI入学率低的原因; (b)估计保险范围对医疗服务利用,财务保护和健康结果的影响,以及c)了解资源有限的家庭如何在其成员之间分配健康资源。这些干预措施增加了签约保险的便利性,提供了有关保险计划信息的教育干预措施,以及包括对保险费的补贴水平各不相同的补贴干预措施。第一章涉及目标(a)和(b)。结果表明,有关保险计划的信息不足,以及保险费和费用会影响入学率。结果还表明,就小额补贴产生实质性入学影响而言,对保险的需求具有价格弹性。保险覆盖率提高了医疗保健服务的利用率,减少了事先有正向支出的个人的自付费用,并适度改善了健康状况。结果表明,在利用和健康成果方面提供信息与提供补贴之间有很强的互补性,这表明联合干预措施对于改变健康寻求行为和结果的重要性。第二章着重于目标(c):资源有限的家庭之间的家庭卫生资源分配。本章中的分析基于仅分配给补贴的家庭和纯对照组。向没有获得全额补贴的家庭发放了两种类型的代金券:一种允许家庭决定如何在其成员之间分配补贴,另一种则使他们无法控制分配。本章比较了这两个凭证的家庭入学模式。结果表明,在存在资源限制的情况下,家庭优先考虑孩子。在儿童中,被允许确定补贴额度分配的家庭中,男孩占女孩的比例为11.7%,比女孩高18%。结果表明,这些分配模式无法用基线健康状况或预期健康来解释。聊天者提供了支持性证据,表明劳动力市场参与程度的差异可能是按性别分列的儿童分配差异的一个可能原因:在7-17岁的儿童中,男孩的劳动力市场参与率比女孩高3.6个百分点。与Ayaga A. Bawah和James F. Phillips合着。本章试图探讨准实验性生殖和计划生育服务的引入如何影响非洲农村地区不同社会经济群体的生育行为。我们将在加纳东部地区卡塞纳-南卡纳地区的准实验性生殖和计划生育服务介绍与Navrongo健康和人口监测系统的纵向数据相结合,以量化社会经济对干预措施的不同生育力影响地位(根据妇女的受教育程度,丈夫的受教育程度和财富来衡量)。我们追踪了18年来超过24,000名育龄妇女(15-49岁)的生育行为和结果。我们的结果表明,在进行干预之前,受过教育的妇女并没有明显减少孩子的数量,而是希望减少家庭规模,并且更有可能使用现代避孕药具。但是,丈夫的教育与较低的生育能力有关,特别是在妻子也受过教育的情况下。财富与较高的生育率有关,这反映了富裕家庭中较高的儿童生存率。而且,控制财富不会影响教育对生育的影响。我们发现,生殖健康干预措施既影响了受过教育的妇女,也影响了未受过教育的妇女,但对受过教育的妇女的影响更大,导致在采取干预措施16年后出现了教育-生育差异。我们的结果表明,在男性主导生殖决策的环境中,她们的受教育程度可能会比女性受教育程度对生育能力产生更大的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Asuming, Patrick Opoku.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 140 p.
  • 总页数 140
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号