首页> 外文学位 >A qualitative case study on the effects of online grading systems on education.
【24h】

A qualitative case study on the effects of online grading systems on education.

机译:关于在线评分系统对教育的影响的定性案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This qualitative case study explored perceptions of teachers and educational administrators regarding differences between online grading systems and traditional written grade books. The purpose was to gain knowledge of online grade books in relation to parental involvement in the educational process and student academic performance, when compared with the older written grade book method. As well as educator's perceptions of the time use required by online grading systems, and any concerns that educators have with the technology, as compared with the older written grade book method. The research method was qualitative, using recorded interviews of participants where interviewees gave their perceptions relating to the research questions in this study. Research Question 1 was, "How do online grading systems affect parental involvement in the educational process compared with traditional written grade books?" After coding of the responses to this research question, the main theme was "Transparency". Research Question 2 was, "How do online grading systems affect student academic performance compared with traditional written grade books?" After coding of the responses to this question, the main theme was, "Transparency". Research Question 3 was, "How do online grading systems affect the time use of educators compared with traditional written grade books?" After coding of the responses to this question, the main theme was, "Grades Automatically". Research question 4 was, "How do the technological concerns with online grading systems compare with traditional written grade books?" After coding of the responses to this question, the main theme was, "Reliability". Educators and educational institutions may find this information useful when making decisions relative to implementing online grading systems.
机译:该定性案例研究探讨了教师和教育管理者对在线评分系统与传统书面评分书之间差异的看法。与较早的书面成绩书方法相比,其目的是获得有关家长参与教育过程和学生学习成绩的在线成绩书的知识。以及教育者对在线评分系统所需时间的理解,以及与较早的书面评分方法相比,教育者对技术的担忧。研究方法是定性的,使用记录的参与者访谈,受访者给出了与本研究中的研究问题相关的看法。研究问题1是:“与传统的书面评分书相比,在线评分系统如何影响父母参与教育过程?”在对这个研究问题的答案进行编码之后,主题是“透明度”。研究问题2是:“与传统的书面评分书相比,在线评分系统如何影响学生的学习成绩?”在对这个问题的答案进行编码之后,主题是“透明度”。研究问题3是:“与传统的书面评分书相比,在线评分系统如何影响教育者的时间使用?”在对这个问题的答案进行编码之后,主要主题是“自动评分”。研究问题4是:“在线评分系统对技术的关注与传统的书面评分书相比如何?”在对这个问题的回答进行编码之后,主题是“可靠性”。当与实施在线评分系统相关的决策时,教育者和教育机构可能会发现此信息很有用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Edgerton, C. Mark, II.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Phoenix.;

  • 授予单位 University of Phoenix.;
  • 学科 Educational leadership.;Educational technology.;Educational administration.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 132 p.
  • 总页数 132
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号